Sorbent-enhanced/membrane-assisted steam-methane reforming

被引:48
|
作者
Chen, Zhongxiang [1 ]
Po, Friedrick [1 ]
Grace, John R. [1 ]
Lim, C. Jim [1 ]
Elnashaie, Said [2 ]
Mahecha-Botero, Andres [1 ]
Rakib, Mohammad [1 ]
Shirasaki, Yoshinori [3 ]
Yasuda, Isamu [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[2] Penn State Univ Harrisburg, Capital Coll, Middletown, PA 17057 USA
[3] Tokyo Gas Co Ltd, Tsurumi Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2300045, Japan
关键词
CO2; sorbent; fluidized bed; hydrogen; membrane reactor; reactor modeling; steam methane reforming;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.031
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Thermodynamic equilibrium and kinetic reactor models are used to simulate a fluidized bed membrane reactor with in situ or ex situ hydrogen and/or CO2 removal for production of pure hydrogen by steam methane reforming. In the equilibrium model, the membranes and CO2 removal are located in separate vessels downstream of the reformer. As the recycle ratio increases, the overall performance approaches that where membranes are located inside the reactor. Whether located in situ or ex situ, hydrogen removal by membranes and CO2 capture by sorbents both enhance hydrogen production. In the kinetic reactor model, a circulating fluidized bed membrane reformer is coupled with a catalyst/sorbent regenerator. Sorbent enhancement combined with membranes could provide very high hydrogen yields. In addition, since carbonation is exothermic, with its heat of reaction similar in magnitude to the endothermic heat of reaction of the net reforming reactions, sorbent enhancement can provide much of the heat needed in the reformer. The overall heat needed for the process would then be provided in a separate calciner, acting as a sorbent regenerator. While the technology is promising, several practical issues need to be examined. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 182
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming
    Ding, Y
    Alpay, E
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2000, 55 (18) : 3929 - 3940
  • [2] Simulation of Sorbent-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming and Limestone Calcination in Dual Turbulent Fluidized Bed Reactors
    Ebneyamini, Arian
    Grace, John R.
    Lim, Choon J.
    Ellis, Naoko
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2020, 34 (06) : 7743 - 7755
  • [3] Sorbent-Enhanced Methane Reforming over a Ni-Ca-Based, Bifunctional Catalyst Sorbent
    Broda, Marcin
    Kierzkowska, Agnieszka M.
    Baudouin, David
    Imtiaz, Qasim
    Coperet, Christophe
    Mueller, Christoph R.
    [J]. ACS CATALYSIS, 2012, 2 (08): : 1635 - 1646
  • [4] Sorbent-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Reaction Studied over a Ca-Based CO2 Sorbent and Ni Catalyst
    Broda, Marcin
    Kierzkowska, Agnieszka M.
    Mueller, Christoph R.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 36 (09) : 1496 - 1502
  • [5] ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES TO STEAM-METHANE REFORMING
    TINDALL, BM
    CREWS, MA
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1995, 74 (11): : 75 - &
  • [6] A dynamic study of steam-methane reforming
    El-Bousiffi, M. A.
    Gunn, D. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2007, 50 (3-4) : 723 - 733
  • [7] Compartment model for steam reforming of methane in a membrane-assisted bubbling fluidized-bed reactor
    Dehkordi, Ashar Molaei
    Memari, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) : 1275 - 1291
  • [8] Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming with intraparticle-diffusion limitations
    Xiu, GH
    Li, P
    Rodrigues, AE
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (1-3) : 83 - 93
  • [9] Additive Manufacturing of Catalyst Substrates for Steam-Methane Reforming
    Kramer, Michelle
    McKelvie, Millie
    Watson, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 27 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [10] A two property catalyst/sorbent pellet design for the sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming process: Mathematical modeling and numerical analysis
    Solsvik, Jannike
    Jakobsen, Hugo A.
    [J]. 2ND TRONDHEIM GAS TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2012, 26 : 31 - 40