A randomized phase-III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III breast cancer

被引:56
|
作者
Lee, Keun Seok [1 ]
Ro, Jungsil [1 ]
Nam, Byung-Ho [1 ]
Lee, Eun Sook [1 ]
Kwon, Youngmee [1 ]
Kwon, Hye Soo [1 ]
Chung, Ki Wook [1 ]
Kang, Han Sung [1 ]
Kim, Eun A. [1 ]
Kim, Seok Won [1 ]
Shin, Kyung Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Seok-Ki [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Inst & Hosp, Goyang Si 410769, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
breast cancer; capecitabine; clinical trial; docetaxel; phase III;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-007-9672-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to determine the efficacies of a non-anthracycline-containing regimen, docetaxel/capecitabine (TX), in comparison with an anthracycline-containing regimen, doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), as primary chemotherapy for node-positive early stage breast cancer. In this phase-III single center randomized study, we randomized 209 women with axillary node positive, stage II/III breast cancer to receive four cycles of either TX or AC followed by surgery and cross-over to the other treatment as an adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was tumor pathologic complete response (pCR). Clinical response rates, toxicity profiles, disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival were secondary objectives. In total, 204 patients had clinical and radiological evaluation of response, and underwent surgery. Compared with AC, TX increased pCR in primary tumors (21% vs. 10%, respectively, P = 0.024) and clinical response (84% vs. 65%, P = 0.003). TX was associated with less nausea and vomiting, but more stomatitis, diarrhea, myalgia, and skin/nail changes than AC. With a median follow-up of 37 months, there was no significant difference in DFS by treatment groups (P = 0.932). Fewer patients developed recurrence who achieved pCR in lymph node (LN) (P = 0.025; hazard ratio, 0.189; 95% CI, 0.044-0.815) in the multivariate analysis. TX showed superior efficacies to AC with increased pathologic and clinical complete response rates. Although these findings did not translate into a gain in DFS, the patients who achieved pCR in LN developed significantly less recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 489
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized phase-III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III breast cancer
    Keun Seok Lee
    Jungsil Ro
    Byung-Ho Nam
    Eun Sook Lee
    Youngmee Kwon
    Hye Soo Kwon
    Ki Wook Chung
    Han Sung Kang
    Eun A Kim
    Seok Won Kim
    Kyung Hwan Shin
    Seok-Ki Kim
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 109 : 481 - 489
  • [3] Phase III randomized trial of primary chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) vs docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) for stage II/III breast cancer (BC): Interim analysis.
    Lee, HG
    Lee, JJ
    Jung, KH
    Kwon, Y
    Shin, EH
    Chung, KW
    Shin, KH
    Kim, EA
    Lee, ES
    Ro, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 29S - 29S
  • [4] Mature results from a randomized phase III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) vs. doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) as primary chemotherapy for patients (pts) with stage II/III breast cancer (BC).
    Lee, KS
    Lee, ES
    Kwon, YM
    Nam, BH
    Kwon, HS
    Chung, KW
    Kang, HS
    Kim, EA
    Kim, SW
    Ro, J
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 : S224 - S224
  • [5] Interim analysis findings from a phase III randomized trial of docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) vs. doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) as primary chemotherapy for stage II/III breast cancer (BC)
    Ahn, Joong-Bae
    Oh, Jung-Hye
    Kwon, Youngmee
    Chung, Ki-Wook
    Kang, Han-Sung
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Eun-A
    Lee, Eun Sook
    Ro, Jungsil
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 : 57 - 57
  • [7] Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer:: Phase III randomized GeparTrio trial
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    Kuemmel, Sherko
    Vogel, Petra
    Hanusch, Claus
    Eidtmann, Holger
    Hilfrich, Joern
    Gerber, Bernd
    Huober, Jens
    Costa, Serban Dan
    Jackisch, Christian
    Loibl, Sibylle
    Mehta, Keyur
    Kaufmann, Manfred
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (08) : 542 - 551
  • [8] A phase-III trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer:: results of the ERASME 3 study
    Cassier, Philippe A.
    Chabaud, Sylvie
    Trillet-Lenoir, Veronique
    Peaud, Pierre-Yves
    Tigaud, Jean-Dominique
    Cure, Herve
    Orfeuvre, Hubert
    Salles, Bruno
    Martin, Claude
    Jacquin, Jean-Philippe
    Agostini, Cecile
    Guastalla, Jean-Paul
    Perol, David
    Bachelot, Thomas
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 109 (02) : 343 - 350
  • [9] A phase-III trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: results of the ERASME 3 study
    Philippe A. Cassier
    Sylvie Chabaud
    Véronique Trillet-Lenoir
    Pierre-Yves Peaud
    Jean-Dominique Tigaud
    Hervé Cure
    Hubert Orfeuvre
    Bruno Salles
    Claude Martin
    Jean-Philippe Jacquin
    Cecile Agostini
    Jean-Paul Guastalla
    David Pérol
    Thomas Bachelot
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 109 : 343 - 350
  • [10] Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial
    Nabholtz, JM
    Falkson, C
    Campos, D
    Szanto, J
    Martin, M
    Chan, S
    Pienkowski, T
    Zaluski, J
    Pinter, T
    Krzakowski, M
    Vorobiof, D
    Leonard, R
    Kennedy, I
    Azli, N
    Murawsky, M
    Riva, A
    Pouillart, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (06) : 968 - 975