Removal of Hg, As in FGD gypsum by different aqueous ammonia (amines) during CO2 sequestration

被引:8
|
作者
Tan Wenyi [1 ]
Fan Wenhui [1 ]
Li Hongyi [1 ]
Zhang Zixin [1 ]
Zhu Yunkun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Inst Technol, Environm Engn Sch, 1 Hongjing Ave, Nanjing 211167, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flue gas desulfurization gypsum; toxic element removal; ammonia; amine; GAS DESULFURIZATION GYPSUM; CALCIUM-CARBONATE; MINERAL CARBONATION; RED GYPSUM; PRECIPITATION; ADSORPTION; EXTRACTION; SOIL;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X17733540
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
CO2 sequestration by flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) has become a promising FGDG disposal technology due to simultaneous CO2 emission reduction and FGDG conversion into calcium carbonate. In this paper, another merit of the novel technology, i.e., the removal of toxic elements (e.g., Hg and As) in FGDG, will be addressed for the first time. In three different aqueous ammonia (or amines) media, removal efficiencies of Hg and As in FGDG samples were evaluated during CO2 sequestration. Higher than 90% and 20% removal efficiencies, respectively, for Hg and As are achieved at 40 degrees C in aqueous ammonia media, but they decrease at elevated temperatures. Ammonia loss takes place at 80 degrees C and pH varies greatly with temperatures in aqueous ammonia. This is disadvantageous for the formation of Hg-ammonia complexes and for the yield of carbonates, which are responsible for Hg or As re-adsorption. The sequential chemical extraction method suggests that the speciation changes of Hg are induced by FGDG carbonation, and that unstable Hg speciation in triethanolamine increases at elevated temperatures.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1301
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CO2 capture by aqueous amines and aqueous ammonia - A Comparison
    Dave, N.
    Do, T.
    Puxty, G.
    Rowland, R.
    Feron, P. H. M.
    Attalla, M. I.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 949 - 954
  • [2] Mineral Carbonation of Red Gypsum for CO2 Sequestration
    Rahmani, Omeid
    Junin, Radzuan
    Tyrer, Mark
    Mohsin, Rahmat
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (09) : 5953 - 5958
  • [3] CO2 Sequestration in Mixtures of Sodium Humate and Waste Gypsum
    Sun, Zhiguo
    Xie, Hongyong
    Xu, Zhongping
    RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-6, 2014, 448-453 : 634 - 637
  • [4] The Effect of Co-Additives (Biochar and FGD Gypsum) on Ammonia Volatilization during the Composting of Livestock Waste
    Febrisiantosa, Andi
    Ravindran, Balasubramani
    Choi, Hong L.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03)
  • [5] Engineering and economics of CO2 removal and sequestration
    Saxena, M. N.
    Flintoff, W.
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2006, 85 (12): : 57 - 64
  • [6] Engineering and economics of CO2 removal and sequestration
    Global Machinery Consultants Pty Ltd., Perth, WA, Australia
    不详
    Hydrocarbon Process, 2006, 12 (57-64):
  • [7] Modeling and simulation of the combined removal of SO2 and CO2 by aqueous ammonia
    Asif, Muhammad
    Kim, Woo-Seung
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 4 (04): : 509 - 527
  • [8] Desulfurization gypsum carbonation for CO2 sequestration by using ammonium salt
    Ding, Wenjin
    Qiao, Jingyi
    Zeng, Li
    Sun, Hongjuan
    Peng, Tongjiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2023, 123
  • [9] Mineral carbonation of flue gas desulfurization gypsum for CO2 sequestration
    Lee, Myung Gyu
    Jang, Young Nam
    Ryu, Kyung Won
    Kim, Wonbeak
    Bang, Jun-Hwan
    ENERGY, 2012, 47 (01) : 370 - 377
  • [10] Volatility of aqueous amines in CO2 capture
    Thu Nguyen
    Hilliard, Marcus
    Rochelle, Gary
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 1624 - 1630