Evolving Multisensor Precipitation Estimation Methods: Their Impacts on Flow Prediction Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model

被引:32
|
作者
Kitzmiller, David [1 ]
Van Cooten, Suzanne [2 ]
Ding, Feng [1 ]
Howard, Kenneth
Langston, Carrie [3 ]
Zhang, Jian [2 ]
Moser, Heather [3 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Gourley, Jonathan J. [2 ]
Kim, Dongsoo [4 ]
Riley, David [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Natl Weather Serv, Off Hydrol Dev, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
[2] NOAA, Natl Severe Storms Lab, Off Ocean & Atmospher Res, Norman, OK 73069 USA
[3] Cooperat Inst Mesoscale Meteorol Studies, Norman, OK USA
[4] NOAA, Natl Climat Data Ctr, Natl Environm Satellite Data & Informat Serv, Camp Springs, MD USA
关键词
REAL-TIME ESTIMATION; RADAR RAINFALL; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-10-05038.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This study investigates evolving methodologies for radar and merged gauge radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) to determine their influence on the flow predictions of a distributed hydrologic model. These methods include the National Mosaic and QPE algorithm package (NMQ), under development at the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL), and the Multisensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) and High-Resolution Precipitation Estimator (HPE) suites currently operational at National Weather Service (NWS) field offices. The goal of the study is to determine which combination of algorithm features offers the greatest benefit toward operational hydrologic forecasting. These features include automated radar quality control, automated Z-R selection, brightband identification, bias correction, multiple radar data compositing, and gauge radar merging, which all differ between NMQ and MPE HPE. To examine the spatial and temporal characteristics of the precipitation fields produced by each of the QPE methodologies, high-resolution (4 km and hourly) gridded precipitation estimates were derived by each algorithm suite for three major precipitation events between 2003 and 2006 over subcatchments within the Tar-Pamlico River basin of North Carolina. The results indicate that the NMQ radar-only algorithm suite consistently yielded closer agreement with reference rain gauge reports than the corresponding HPE radar-only estimates did. Similarly, the NMQ radar-only QPE input generally yielded hydrologic simulations that were closer to observations at multiple stream gauging points. These findings indicate that the combination of Z-R selection and freezing-level identification algorithms within NMQ, but not incorporated within MPE and HPE, would have an appreciable positive impact on hydrologic simulations. There were relatively small differences between NMQ and HPE gauge radar estimates in terms of accuracy and impacts on hydrologic simulations, most likely due to the large influence of the input rain gauge information.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1431
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the impacts of precipitation bias on distributed hydrologic model calibration and prediction accuracy
    Looper, Jonathan P.
    Vieux, Baxter E.
    Moreno, Maria A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 418 : 110 - 122
  • [2] Precipitation Estimation Methods in Continuous, Distributed Urban Hydrologic Modeling
    Woodson, David
    Adams, Thomas E., III
    Dymond, Randel
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (07):
  • [3] Assessment of evolving TRMM-based multisatellite real-time precipitation estimation methods and their impacts on hydrologic prediction in a high latitude basin
    Yong, Bin
    Hong, Yang
    Ren, Li-Liang
    Gourley, Jonathan J.
    Huffman, George J.
    Chen, Xi
    Wang, Wen
    Khan, Sadiq I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2012, 117
  • [4] Radar and Multisensor Precipitation Estimation Techniques in National Weather Service Hydrologic Operations
    Kitzmiller, David
    Miller, Dennis
    Fulton, Richard
    Ding, Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [5] Performance and Evaluation of Multisensor Precipitation Estimation Algorithm Using a High Density Rain Gauge Network and Hydrologic Simulation
    Gonzalez, Alejandra M. Rojas
    Harmsen, Eric W.
    Pol, Sandra Cruz
    [J]. 21ST CENTURY WATERSHED TECHNOLOGY: IMPROVING WATER QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2010,
  • [6] Multiscale Hydrologic Applications of the Latest Satellite Precipitation Products in the Yangtze River Basin using a Distributed Hydrologic Model
    Li, Zhe
    Yang, Dawen
    Gao, Bing
    Jiao, Yang
    Hong, Yang
    Xu, Tao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2015, 16 (01) : 407 - 426
  • [7] Discussion of theory and methods for building a distributed hydrologic model
    Zhang, Jin-Cun
    Rui, Xiao-Fang
    [J]. Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science, 2007, 18 (02): : 286 - 292
  • [8] NEXRAD Quantitative Precipitation Estimations for Hydrologic Simulation Using a Hybrid Hydrologic Model
    Cho, Younghyun
    Engel, Bernard A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2017, 18 (01) : 25 - 47
  • [9] Hydrologic Modeling of the Blue River Basin Using NEXRAD Precipitation Data with a Semidistributed and a Fully Distributed Model
    Islam, Zahidul
    Gan, Thian Yew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (10)
  • [10] Evaluation of the impacts of hydrologic model calibration methods on predictability of ecologically-relevant hydrologic indices
    Hernandez-Suarez, J. Sebastian
    Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan
    Kropp, Ian M.
    Abouali, Mohammad
    Zhang, Zhen
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2018, 564 : 758 - 772