Worldwide Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:65
|
作者
Roman-Galvez, Rosario M. [1 ,2 ]
Martin-Pelaez, Sandra [3 ,4 ]
Fernandez-Felix, Borja M. [5 ,6 ]
Zamora, Javier [5 ,6 ]
Khan, Khalid S. [3 ,6 ]
Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora [3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Ciencias Salud, Dept Enfermeria, Granada, Spain
[2] Unidad Asistencial Alhama Granada, Serv Andaluz Salud, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Fac Med, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Granada, Spain
[4] Inst Invest Biosanitaria Granada IBS, Granada, Spain
[5] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Inst Ramon y Cajal Invest Sanitaria IRYCIS, Clin Biostat Unit, Madrid, Spain
[6] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Pub, Madrid, Spain
关键词
pregnancy; intimate partner violence; domestic violence; prenatal care; prevalence; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; SEXUAL-ABUSE; WOMEN; OUTCOMES; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.738459
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects outcomes of mothers and their offspring. This systematic review collated the worldwide literature on the prevalence rates of different types of IPV in pregnancy.</p> & nbsp;</p> Methods: Two reviewers independently identified cross sectional and cohort studies of IPV prevalence in pregnancy in online databases (PubMed, WOS and Scopus), selected and extracted data [participants' country, study quality, measurement tool (validation and purpose) and rates of IPV in pregnancy]. We considered a high quality study if it had a prospective design, an adequate sampling method, a sample size estimation, a response rate > 90%, a contemporary ascertainment of IPV in the index pregnancy, and a well-developed detailed IPV tool. We performed random effects meta-analysis and explored reasons for heterogeneity of rates.</p> & nbsp;</p> Results: One hundred fifty-five studies were included, of which 44 (28%) met two-thirds of the quality criteria. Worldwide prevalence of physical (126 studies, 220,462 participants), psychological (113 studies, 189,630 participants) and sexual (98 studies, 155,324 participants) IPV in pregnancy was 9.2% (95% CI 7.7-11.1%, I-2 95.9%), 18.7% (15.1-22.9%, I-2 98.2%), 5.5% (4.0-7.5%, I-2 93.4%), respectively. Where several types of IPV were reported combined, the prevalence of any kind of IPV (118 studies, 124,838 participants) was 25.0% (20.3, 30.5%, I-2 98.6%). IPV rates varied within and between continents, being the highest in Africa and the lowest in Europe (p < 0.001). Rates also varied according to measurement purpose, being higher for diagnosis than for screening, in physical (p = 0.022) and sexual (p = 0.014) IPV.</p> & nbsp;</p> Conclusions: IPV prevalence in pregnancy varies across countries, with one-quarter of mothers exposed on average globally. Routine systematic antenatal detection should be applied worldwide.</p> & nbsp;</p> Systematic Review Registration: identifier: CRD42020176131.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Tingting
    Liu, Yuan
    Lie, Zhanzhan
    Liu, Kaihua
    Xu, Yang
    Shi, Wenpei
    Chen, Lizhang
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [2] Intimate partner violence during pregnancy in turkey: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boyacioglu, Nur Elcin
    Gunaydin, Sevil
    Ozcan, Neslihan Keser
    Kaya, Husniye Dinc
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2021, 57 (03) : 1515 - 1527
  • [3] Associations between Intimate Partner Violence and Termination of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hall, Megan
    Chappell, Lucy C.
    Parnell, Bethany L.
    Seed, Paul T.
    Bewley, Susan
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (01)
  • [4] Intimate Partner Violence in Transgender Populations: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence and Correlates
    Peitzmeier, Sarah M.
    Malik, Mannat
    Kattari, Shanna K.
    Marrow, Elliot
    Stephenson, Rob
    Agenor, Madina
    Reisner, Sari L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (09) : E1 - E14
  • [5] Narcissism and Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Oliver, Eliza
    Coates, Alexander
    Bennett, Joanne M.
    Willis, Megan L.
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2024, 25 (03) : 1871 - 1884
  • [6] A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes
    Hill, Amber
    Pallitto, Christina
    McCleary-Sills, Jennifer
    Garcia-Moreno, Claudia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 133 (03) : 269 - 276
  • [7] Prevalence of intimate partner violence perpetration among military populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kwan, J.
    Sparrow, K.
    Facer-Irwin, E.
    Thandi, G.
    Fear, N. T.
    MacManus, D.
    AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2020, 53
  • [8] The prevalence of intimate partner violence among Iranian pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Raziani, Yosra
    Hasheminasab, Leila
    Gheshlagh, Reza Ghanei
    Dalvand, Pegah
    Baghi, Vajiheh
    Aslani, Marzieh
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 52 (01) : 108 - 118
  • [9] Intimate partner violence and child attachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Noonan, Clare Bridget
    Pilkington, Pamela Doreen
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2020, 109
  • [10] Problem Gambling and Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dowling, Nicki
    Suomi, Aino
    Jackson, Alun
    Lavis, Tiffany
    Patford, Janet
    Cockman, Suzanne
    Thomas, Shane
    Bellringer, Maria
    Koziol-Mclain, Jane
    Battersby, Malcolm
    Harvey, Peter
    Abbott, Max
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2016, 17 (01) : 43 - 61