A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran A cost-utility analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Saiyarsarai, Parisa [1 ,2 ]
Robabpour Derakhshan, Atefeh [1 ]
Khedmati, Jamaleddin [1 ]
Eshghi, Peyman [3 ]
Seyedifar, Meysam [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmacoecon & Pharmaceut Adm, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Inst Pharmaceut Sci TIPS, Pharmaceut Management & Econ Res Ctr PMERC, 16 Azar St,Enqelab Sq, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Pediat Congenital Hematol Disorders Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
antibodies; anti-inhibitor coagulant complex; bispecific; emicizumab; Hemlibra; hemophilia A; recombinant recombinant factor VII activated; IMMUNE TOLERANCE INDUCTION; FACTOR-VII ARYOSEVEN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; THERAPY; NOVOSEVEN; DEFERASIROX; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000027303
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disease with costly treatment, especially for high titer inhibitory patients. Emicizumab, a new humanized bispecific antibody, has been approved for use to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in HA patients with inhibitors. This study evaluated the cost-utility of emicizumab prophylaxis (EP) in comparison with recombinant factor VII activated on-demand treatment in HA patients with inhibitors. Methods: A life-time Markov model with payer and societal perspectives was developed in different age groups with different annual bleeding rates (ABR). Efficacy of treatments were extracted from HAVEN trials. Utilities were retrieved from published evidence. Costs were calculated based on Iran food and drug administration official website, national tariff book for medical services and hospital data. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: EP was dominant choice in comparison with on-demand administration of recombinant factor VII activated in all age groups with ABR 20 and 25, and it remained dominant in patients with age 2 and age 12 at start point with ABR 16 and 17. The reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the group with ABR 18 at the age 20, was 12,936 United States Dollars which is lower than the acceptable threshold of cost-effectiveness in Iran (1-3 gross domestic product per capita) and EP can be considered as cost-effective choice in this scenario. Conclusion: EP was found to be a dominant and cost-effective choice for Iranian HA patients with factor VIII inhibitors with ABR 18 and above with considerable cost saving.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON BETWEEN ON DEMAND USAGE OF RFVIIA VS PROPHYLAXIS USE OF EMICIZUMAB IN HIGH TITER INHIBITORY HEMOPHILIA A PATIENTS IN IRAN; A COST UTILITY ANALYSIS
    Seyedifar, M.
    Khedmati, J.
    Eshghi, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S445 - S445
  • [2] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF IMMUNE TOLERANCE INDUCTION (ITI) THERAPY VERSUS ON-DEMAND TREATMENT WITH RECOMBINANT FVII (RFVIIA) FOR HEMOPHILIA A WITH HIGH TITER INHIBITORS IN IRAN
    Imani, A.
    Rasekh, H.
    Golestani, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A680 - A680
  • [3] COST-UTILITY OF PROPHYLAXIS VS. ON-DEMAND TREATMENT IN SEVERE HAEMOPHILIA A PATIENTS
    Gharibnaseri, Z.
    Davari, M.
    Cheraghali, A.
    Eshghi, P.
    Ravanbod, R.
    Spendar, R.
    Khedmati, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A591 - A591
  • [4] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS, COMPARED WITH ON-DEMAND TREATMENT, FOR PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEMOPHILIA TYPE A IN COLOMBIA
    Castro Jaramillo, Hector Eduardo
    Moreno Viscaya, Mabel
    Mejia, Aurelio E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (05) : 337 - 347
  • [5] Cost-utility analysis of immune tolerance induction therapy versus on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VII for hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors in Iran
    Rasekh, Hamid Reza
    Imani, Ali
    Karimi, Mehran
    Golestani, Mina
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2011, 3 : 207 - 212
  • [6] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF ANTIHEMOPHILIC FACTOR RFVIII-FS FOR SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS VS ON-DEMAND THERAPY IN SEVERE HAEMOPHILIA A IN ITALY
    Tagliaferri, A.
    Coppola, A.
    Amoresano, S.
    Aiello, A.
    D'Ausilio, A.
    Toumi, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A671 - A671
  • [7] Budget impact and cost-utility analysis of prophylactic emicizumab versus on-demand bypassing agents for adolescent severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors in India
    Krishnamoorthy, Yuvaraj
    Govindan, Dhanajayan
    Kannan, Narasimhapriyan
    Majella, Marie Gilbert
    Hariharan, Vishnu Shankar
    Valliappan, Vivek
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (05)
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF PROPHYLAXIS VS ON-DEMAND SUPPLY OF FACTOR IX IN PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH MODERATE HEMOPHILIA B IN COLOMBIA
    Ordonez Molina, J. E.
    Duque, J. G.
    Gutierrez-Ardila, M., V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A228 - A228
  • [9] A cost-effectiveness analysis of the prophylaxis versus on-demand regimens in severe hemophilia A patients under 12 years old in southern Iran
    Zahedi, Zohreh
    Karimi, Mehran
    Keshavarz, Khosro
    Haghpanah, Sezaneh
    Ravangard, Ramin
    HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 26 (01) : 240 - 248
  • [10] ESTIMATING UTILITY WEIGHTS IN HEMOPHILIA A PATIENTS WITH INHIBITORS USING THE EQ-5D-5L TOOL: A COMPARISON OF EMICIZUMAB PROPHYLAXIS VERSUS ON-DEMAND TREATMENT WITH BYPASSING AGENTS
    Park, S.
    Baik, D.
    Lee, H.
    Han, J. W.
    Park, Y. S.
    Kim, H. C.
    Kang, H. Y.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S867 - S867