This time it was different? The salience of the Spitzenkandidaten system among European parties

被引:19
|
作者
Braun, Daniela [1 ,2 ]
Popa, Sebastian A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] LMU, Munich, Germany
[2] Mannheim Ctr European Social Res MZES, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Geog Polit & Sociol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Mannheim Ctr European Social Res MZES, Mannheim, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
European Union; elections; lead candidates; party behaviour; manifesto data; MASS-ELITE LINKAGES; PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS; ISSUE OWNERSHIP; 2ND-ORDER; VOTE; INTEGRATION; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; CHOICE; EU;
D O I
10.1080/01402382.2017.1419003
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The Lisbon Treaty (2009) introduced key institutional changes to increase the relevance of elections to the European Parliament (EP). Among others, major political groups nominated different lead candidates, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, for the 2014 EP elections. The aim of this article is to investigate how national political parties react to this new institutional setting. Using data from the 2014 Euromanifesto study, the article examines if and under what conditions political parties put emphasis on the Spitzenkandidaten system in their party manifestos and whether they take positive or negative stances when talking about it. The findings reveal that parties put little emphasis on the issue. Moreover, the factors promoting the Spitzenkandidaten system suggest that parties decide strategically upon emphasising that topic or take a positive stance on it if they expect to benefit from this.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1125 / 1145
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条