Quantitative Account of the Bonding Properties of a Rubredoxin Model Complex [Fe(SCH3)4]q, q =-2,-1,+2,+3

被引:6
|
作者
Tzeli, Demeter [1 ,2 ]
Raugei, Simone [3 ]
Xantheas, Sotiris S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Chem, Lab Phys Chem, Athens 15784, Greece
[2] Natl Hellen Res Fdn, Theoret & Phys Chem Inst, Athens 11635, Greece
[3] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Phys Sci Div, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[4] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Adv Comp Math & Data Div, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Chem, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
IRON-SULFUR CLUSTERS; CORRELATED MOLECULAR CALCULATIONS; DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY; GAUSSIAN-BASIS SETS; ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE; ACTIVE-SITE; AB-INITIO; PHOTOELECTRON-SPECTROSCOPY; QUANTUM-CHEMISTRY; SYNTHETIC ANALOGS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00485
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Iron-sulfur clusters play important roles in biology as parts of electron-transfer chains and catalytic cofactors. Here, we report a detailed computational analysis of a structural model of the simplest natural iron-sulfur cluster of rubredoxin and its cationic counterparts. Specifically, we investigated adiabatic reduction energies, dissociation energies, and bonding properties of the low-lying electronic states of the complexes [Fe(SCH3)(4)](2-/1-/2+/3+) using multireference (CASSCF, MRCISD), and coupled cluster [CCSD(T)] methodologies. We show that the nature of the Fe-S chemical bond and the magnitude of the ionization potentials in the anionic and cationic [Fe(SCH3)(4)] complexes offer a physical rationale for the relative stabilization, structure, and speciation of these complexes. Anionic and cationic complexes present different types of chemical bonds: prevalently ionic in [Fe(SCH3)(4)](2-/1-) complexes and covalent in [Fe(SCH3)(4)](2+/3+) complexes. The ionic bonds result in an energy gain for the transition [Fe(SCH3)(4)](2-)->[Fe(SCH3)(4)](-) (i.e., Fe-II -> Fe-III) of 1.5 eV, while the covalent bonds result in an energy loss for the transition [Fe(SCH3)(4)](2+) -> [Fe(SCH3)(4)](3+) of 16.6 eV, almost half of the ionization potential of Fe2+. The ionic versus covalent bond character influences the Fe-S bond strength and length, that is, ionic Fe-S bonds are longer than covalent ones by about 0.2 angstrom (for Fe-II) and 0.04 angstrom (for Fe-II). Finally, the average Fe-S heterolytic bond strength is 6.7 eV (Fe-II) and 14.6 eV (Fe-III) at the RCCSD(T) level of theory.
引用
收藏
页码:6080 / 6091
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条