Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second-stage labor on fetal well-being

被引:8
|
作者
Simpson, KR
James, DC
机构
[1] St Johns Mercy Med Ctr, St Louis, MO 63141 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Nursing, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
delayed pushing fetal; oxygen saturation; second-stage labor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Although there are two methods of caring for women with epidural anesthesia during second-stage labor (coached closed-glottis pushing immediately at 10-cm cervical dilation or delayed pushing until the woman feels the urge to push, passive fetal descent, and encouragement of open-glottis pushing when the woman has the urge to push), there are limited data concerning which method is most optimal for fetal well-being. Objective: To evaluate effects on fetal well-being, as measured by fetal oxygen saturation, of two different methods of second-stage labor nursing care for women with epidural anesthesia. Methods: Forty-five nulliparous women who had progressed to the second stage were randomized to 1 of 2 groups (immediate or delayed pushing). Fetal oxygen saturation was continuously monitored and values at 10 cm, initiation of pushing and immediately prior to birth, as well as the amount of time that fetal oxygen saturation values were abnormal (< 30 %) were compared between groups. Also evaluated were additional measures of fetal well-being such as fetal heart rate patterns, Apgar scores, and umbilical cord blood gases and maternal outcomes including length of labor, method of birth, and perineal status. Results: There was a significant difference between groups in fetal oxygen desaturation during the second stage (immediate: M = 12.5; delayed: M = 4.6) F(1, 43) = 12.24, p =.001, and in the number of >= 2-min epochs of fetal oxygen saturation < 30 % (immediate: M = 7.9; delayed: M = 2.7), F(1, 43) = 6.23, p = .02. There were more variable decelerations of the fetal heart rate in the immediate pushing group (immediate: M = 22.4; delayed: M = 15.6) F(1, 43) = 5.92, p =.02. There were no differences in length of labor, method of birth, Apgar scores, or umbilical cord blood gases. Women who pushed immediately had more perineal lacerations (immediate: n 13; delayed: n = 5) chi(2)(1, N = 45) = 6.54, p = .01. Discussion: Delayed pushing results in less fetal oxygen desaturation and less >= 2-min epochs of fetal oxygen saturation < 30 % during second-stage labor than the immediate pushing method; thus, delayed pushing is more favorable for fetal well-being as measured by fetal oxygen saturation.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 157
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DELAYED VERSUS IMMEDIATE PUSHING IN SECOND STAGE OF LABOR
    Kelly, Mary
    Johnson, Eileen
    Lee, Vickie
    Massey, Liz
    Purser, Debbie
    Ring, Karen
    Sanderson, Stephanye
    Styles, Juanita
    Wood, Deb
    MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2010, 35 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [2] Immediate vs Delayed Pushing During the Second Stage of Labor
    Sperling, Jeffrey D.
    Gossett, Dana R.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (14): : 1439 - 1440
  • [3] Immediate or delayed pushing in the second stage of labor?
    Devitt, Jessica
    Lyon, Corey
    Mounsey, Anne
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 69 (04): : 207 - 208
  • [4] Pushing during second-stage labor is matter of preference
    French, L
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2006, 73 (10) : 1819 - 1820
  • [5] Comparison of Delayed Versus Immediate Pushing During Second Stage of Labor for Nulliparous Women With Epidural Anesthesia
    Gillesby, Erica
    Burns, Suzan
    Dempsey, Amy
    Kirby, Shirley
    Mogensen, Kami
    Naylor, Kelly
    Petrella, JoAnn
    Vanicelli, Rebecca
    Whelan, Breon
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2010, 39 (06): : 635 - 644
  • [6] Comparison of Delayed Versus Immediate Pushing During Second Stage of Labor for Nulliparous Women With Epidural Anesthesia
    Gillesby, Erica Jean
    Mogensen, Kami Diann
    Burns, Suzan Marie
    Kirby, Shirley
    Naylor, Kelly Suzanne
    Petrella, JoAnn
    Vanicelli, Rebecca
    Whelan, Breon
    Dempsey, Amy
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2010, 39 : S87 - S87
  • [7] Second-stage labor: consensus versus science
    Nelson, David B.
    McIntire, Donald D.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (02) : 144 - 149
  • [8] Maternal outcomes using delayed pushing versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labour: An umbrella review
    Deusa-Lopez, Paula
    Cuenca-Martinez, Ferran
    Sanchez-Martinez, Vanessa
    Sempere-Rubio, Nuria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2024, 152
  • [9] THE SQUATTING POSITION FOR THE 2ND STAGE OF LABOR - EFFECTS ON LABOR AND ON MATERNAL AND FETAL WELL-BEING
    GOLAY, J
    VEDAM, S
    SORGER, L
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1993, 20 (02): : 73 - 78
  • [10] Immediate Compared With Delayed Pushing in the Second Stage of Labor A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Frey, Heather A.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (03): : 660 - 668