Unfractionated heparin in acute chest syndrome: a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of unfractionated heparin vs. standard of care in acute chest syndrome

被引:3
|
作者
Seaman, Craig D. [1 ,2 ]
Novelli, Enrico [1 ]
De Castro, Laura [1 ]
Ragni, Margaret, V [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Hemophilia Ctr Western Penn, 3636 Blvd Allies, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Acute chest syndrome; Heparin; Sickle cell disease; Thrombosis; DISEASE; CRISIS;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-020-00715-w
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundAcute chest syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of mortality in sickle cell disease (SCD). The pathogenesis of ACS is complex and not entirely understood with multiple etiologies likely contributing simultaneously. One particular etiology is pulmonary vascular occlusion due to thrombosis. Thus, anticoagulation is an attractive therapeutic modality.MethodsThis was a single-center, randomized controlled, open-label, pilot study to determine the feasibility of performing a larger multicenter phase III trial to assess the effects of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in ACS. Subjects were randomized within 24 h of diagnosis of ACS to one of two treatment arms, UFH, and standard of care (SOC), or no UFH and SOC. UFH was given intravenously for 7 days, or until discharge, if discharge was shorter than 7 days. SOC consisted of intravenous fluids, antibiotics, supplemental oxygen, analgesia, red blood cell transfusion, and exchange transfusion.ResultsFrom July 2014 to June 2018, a total of 7 patients underwent randomization (four patients received UFH in addition to SOC and 3 patients received SOC only). Two of the prespecified feasibility criteria were not met: the capacity to consent eligible individuals and the timely notification of hospitalized patients with ACS necessary to permit randomization within 24 h of diagnosis; thus, as a result of poor enrollment, the study was terminated early. The duration of hospitalization was 279.43 (SD 267.98) and 127.31 (SD 137.70) h in the UFH and SOC arms, respectively. The duration of hypoxemia, leukocytosis, fever, and moderate to severe pain was 117.52 (SD 60.52), 24.90 (SD 29.69), 117.52 (SD 60.52), and 117.52 (SD 60.52) h, respectively, in the UFH group, and 51.49 (SD 44.79), 0, 53.11 (SD 25.06), and 88.68 (SD 72.77) h, respectively, in the SOC group. No major bleeding was noted in either group.ConclusionsOur study did not achieve prespecified feasibility criteria, resulting in poor enrollment and early termination, and serves to highlight some of the pitfalls experienced in clinical research in SCD. It did show the use of UFH without any major adverse events in 7 subjects. No future large-scale study is planned.Trials registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT #02098993) on March 28, 2014.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unfractionated heparin in acute chest syndrome: a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of unfractionated heparin vs. standard of care in acute chest syndrome
    Craig D. Seaman
    Enrico Novelli
    Laura De Castro
    Margaret V. Ragni
    [J]. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6
  • [2] Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome
    Kanna, B
    Sharma, P
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (16): : 1952 - 1952
  • [3] Is the use of unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome outmoded?
    Chiquette E.
    Chilton R.
    [J]. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2004, 6 (2) : 94 - 100
  • [4] Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin or Heparinoids vs. Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke
    Newsom, Cresilda T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2018, 118 (05) : 61 - 61
  • [5] UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN IS SUPERIOR TO BIVALIRUDIN IN TRANSRADIAL PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
    Meraj, Perwaiz M.
    Doshi, Rajkumar
    Patel, Amitkumar
    George, Bhavitha
    Jauhar, Rajiv
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 1351 - 1351
  • [6] Acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management treated with bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin: insights fromthe MATRIX trial
    Landi, Antonio
    Branca, Mattia
    Ando, Giuseppe
    Russo, Filippo
    Frigoli, Enrico
    Gargiulo, Giuseppe
    Briguori, Carlo
    Vranckx, Pascal
    Leonardi, Sergio
    Gragnano, Felice
    Calabro, Paolo
    Campo, Gianluca
    Ambrosio, Giuseppe
    Santucci, Andrea
    Varbella, Ferdinando
    Zaro, Tiziana
    Heg, Dik
    Windecker, Stephan
    Juni, Peter
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Valgimigli, Marco
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2021, 10 (10) : 1170 - 1179
  • [7] Outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized to enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin: results from the SYNERGY trial
    Lopes, Renato D.
    Alexander, Karen P.
    Marcucci, Gretchen
    White, Harvey D.
    Spinler, Sarah
    Col, Jacques
    Aylward, Philip E.
    Califf, Robert M.
    Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (15) : 1827 - 1833
  • [8] Streptokinase Versus Unfractionated Heparin Nebulization in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): A Randomized Controlled Trial With Observational Controls
    Mahmoud, Ahmed Abdelaal Ahmed
    Mahmoud, Hatem Elmoutaz
    Mahran, Mohamed Ali
    Khaled, Marwa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (02) : 436 - 443
  • [9] Treatment of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized pilot trial comparing dalteparin to unfractionated heparin.
    Ensom, MHH
    Houlihan, E
    Ballem, PJ
    Stephenson, MD
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 23 (10): : 1368 - 1368
  • [10] A review of antithrombotic therapies in acute coronary syndrome - Should unfractionated heparin be replaced?
    Speredelozzi, Nicole
    Baroletti, Steven
    Fanikos, John
    [J]. FORMULARY, 2007, 42 (03) : 150 - +