Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO2 Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas

被引:1
|
作者
Yang Hongjun [1 ]
Fan Shuanshi [1 ]
Lang Xuemei [1 ]
Wang Yanhong [1 ]
Nie Jianghua [1 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, Key Lab Enhanced Heat Transfer & Energy Conservat, Minist Educ, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
CO2 capture cost; flue gas; chemical absorption; membrane gas separation; pressure swing adsorption; COST; ABSORPTION; SEQUESTRATION; OPTIONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Three gas separation technologies, chemical absorption, membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption, are usually applied for CO2 capture from flue gas in coal-fired power plants. In this work, the costs of the three technologies are analyzed and compared. The cost for chemical absorption is mainly from $30 to $60 per ton (based on CO2 avoided), while the minimum value is $10 per ton (based on CO2 avoided). As for membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption, the costs are $50 to $78 and $40 to $63 per ton (based on CO2 avoided), respectively. Measures are proposed to reduce the cost of the three technologies. For CO2 capture and storage process, the CO2 recovery and purity should be greater than 90%. Based on the cost, recovery, and purity, it seems that chemical absorption is currently the most cost-effective technology for CO2 capture from flue gas from power plants. However, membrane gas separation is the most promising alternative approach in the future, provided that membrane performance is further improved.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 620
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chitosan for separation and capture of CO2 from flue gas
    Levitskaia, Tatiana G.
    Casella, Amanda J.
    Peterson, James M.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 239
  • [2] Solvent Degradation in CO2 Capture Process from Power Plant Flue Gas
    Rashid, Haroon Ur
    Khan, Khalid
    Yaseen, Muhammad
    Umar, Muhammad Naveed
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 49 (06) : 371 - 375
  • [3] Solvent Degradation in CO2 Capture Process from Power Plant Flue Gas
    Haroon Ur Rashid
    Khalid Khan
    Muhammad Yaseen
    Muhammad Naveed Umar
    [J]. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry, 2014, 49 : 371 - 375
  • [4] Economic Evaluations of CO2 Capture Process from Power Plant Flue Gas Using Dry Sorbents
    Shin, Byung Chul
    Kwak, Hyun
    Lee, Kwang Min
    [J]. KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (04): : 646 - 653
  • [5] Membrane gas separation processes for CO2 capture from cement kiln flue gas
    Scholes, Colin A.
    Ho, Minh T.
    Aguiar, Alita A.
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    Stevens, Geoff W.
    Kentish, Sandra E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 24 : 78 - 86
  • [6] CO2 Capture from Flue Gas with Monoethanolamine
    Cebrucean, Viorica
    Ionel, Ioana
    [J]. REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2012, 63 (07): : 678 - 681
  • [7] Polymeric CO2/N2 gas separation membranes for the capture of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gases
    Powell, Clem E.
    Qiao, Greg G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 279 (1-2) : 1 - 49
  • [8] Energy and economic analysis of the CO2 capture from flue gas of combined cycle power plants
    Vaccarelli, Maura
    Carapellucci, Roberto
    Giordano, Lorena
    [J]. ATI 2013 - 68TH CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, 2014, 45 : 1165 - 1174
  • [9] A Review of Gas Capture and Liquid Separation Technologies by CO2 Gas Hydrate
    Misyura, Sergey
    Strizhak, Pavel
    Meleshkin, Anton
    Morozov, Vladimir
    Gaidukova, Olga
    Shlegel, Nikita
    Shkola, Maria
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (08)
  • [10] Membrane pilot plant trials of CO2 separation from flue gas
    Scholes, Colin A.
    Qader, Abdul
    Stevens, Geoff W.
    Kentish, Sandra E.
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 5 (03): : 229 - 237