How History Wars Shape Foreign Policy: An Ancient Kingdom and the Future of China-South Korea Relations

被引:3
|
作者
Gries, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Masui, Yasuki [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester China Inst, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Chinese Polit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Niigata Daigaku, Niigata, Japan
关键词
history wars; foreign policy; nationalism; public opinion; collective psychological ownership; pride; anger; national territory; China-South Korea relations; Goguryeo Kingdom; COLLECTIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP; OPPOSITION; EMOTIONS; SELF;
D O I
10.1017/jea.2021.30
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Do history wars shape international affairs? If so, how and for whom? Taking the historical dispute between China and South Korea over the ancient Gaogouli/Goguryeo Kingdom as a case study, this article explores the individual-level psychological micro-foundations of history wars. A 2020 survey experiment in South Korea pit "ours" vs "theirs" Goguryeo imitation Wikipedia entries to explore their downstream consequences. It revealed direct, indirect, and conditional effects. Exposure to China's claim to the Kingdom undermined Korean pride, increasing dislike of China, and lessening desires to cooperate with it. Pre-existing levels of nationalism divided South Koreans in how angry they became after exposure the Wikipedia primes. That anger, however, only shaped the China policy preferences of those South Koreans who viewed the balance of military power with China favorably. Implications for ownership disputes over kimchi and other national possessions are also discussed, as are the implications of history wars for war and peace in twenty-first-century East Asia.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 41 条