Do corporations learn from mispricing? Evidence from takeovers and corporate performance

被引:1
|
作者
Adra, Samer [1 ]
Barbopoulos, Leonidas G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Edgbaston Pk Rd, Birmingham B15 2TY, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Univ Ave, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Mispricing; Information; Acquisitions; Acquirer returns; Corporate profits; LONG-TERM-MEMORY; STOCK-MARKET; HURST EXPONENT; MERGER; INVESTMENT; EFFICIENCY; VALUATION; RANGE; FIRMS; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2017.08.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this article we form the simple prediction that mispricing encourages traders to collect costly information that guides managerial decisions at corporate level. Our findings support this prediction based on evidence derived from both the US market for corporate control and the overall variation in aggregate corporate profits. The trading activity in response to the temporary mispricing of the merging companies provides useful information that leads to the design of high-synergy deals. Such synergies are reflected in an increase in the announcement period acquirer abnormal returns and are not reversed in the long-run. At the market-wide level, our results suggest that the growth in the overall stock trading volume in response to market mispricing is associated with high future corporate profit growth. Overall, after controlling for several economic and financial conditions, the temporary mispricing in a developed and generally efficient stock market stimulates informative trading, ultimately leading to value- and performance-enhancing corporate decisions. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Leverage and corporate performance: Evidence from unsuccessful takeovers
    Safieddine, A
    Titman, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1999, 54 (02): : 547 - 580
  • [2] Debt and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Unsuccessful Takeovers.
    Safieddine, Assem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (03): : 1253 - 1253
  • [3] Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting
    Atanassov, Julian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (03): : 1097 - 1131
  • [4] Do progressive social norms affect economic outcomes? Evidence from corporate takeovers
    Chen, Yangyang
    Podolski, Edward J.
    Rhee, S. Ghon
    Veeraraghavan, Madhu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2017, 41 : 76 - 95
  • [5] Uncertainty triggers overreaction: evidence from corporate takeovers
    Black, Emma L.
    Guo, Jie
    Hu, Nan
    Vagenas-Nanos, Evangelos
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2017, 23 (14): : 1362 - 1389
  • [6] Do single takeovers outperform corporate acquisition programs? Evidence from the French stock market
    Boufama, Omar
    Rogova, Elena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 22 (2-3) : 291 - 308
  • [7] The dark side of shareholder litigation: Evidence from corporate takeovers
    Chu, Yongqiang
    Zhao, Yijia
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 50 (03) : 845 - 873
  • [8] Does product market competition affect corporate governance? Evidence from corporate takeovers
    Oh, Frederick Dongchuhl
    Shin, Sean Seunghun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2020, 59 : 68 - 87
  • [9] Do boards affect performance? Evidence from corporate restructuring
    Perry, T
    Shivdasani, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2005, 78 (04): : 1403 - 1431
  • [10] HOW DO TAKEOVERS CREATE SYNERGIES? EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE
    Hamza, Taher
    Sghaier, Adnene
    Thraya, Mohamed Firas
    [J]. STUDIES IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 11 (01) : 54 - 72