The Effects of High Alkaline Fly Ash on Strength Behaviour of a Cohesive Soil

被引:16
|
作者
Binal, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Geol Engn, Fac Engn, Beytepe Campus, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
SWELLING BEHAVIOR; TRACE-ELEMENTS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EXPANSIVE SOIL; FUZZY MODEL; POWER-PLANT; STABILIZATION; PREDICTION; IMPROVEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1155/2016/3048716
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Contemporarily, there are 16 coal-burning thermal power plants currently operating in Turkey. This number is expected to rise to 46 in the future. Annually, about 15 million tons of fly ash are removed from the existing thermal power plants in Turkey, but a small proportion of it, 2%, is recyclable. Turkey's plants are fired by lignite, producing Class C fly ash containing a high percentage of lime. Sulfate and alkali levels are also higher in Class C fly ashes. Therefore, fly ash is, commonly, unsuitable as an additive in cement or concrete in Turkey. In this study, highly alkaline fly ash obtained from the Yenikoy thermal power plants is combined with soil samples in different proportions (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%) and changes in the geomechanical properties of Ankara clay were investigated. The effect of curing time on the physicomechanical properties of the fly ash mixed soil samples was also analyzed. The soil classification of Ankara clay changed from CH to MH due to fly ash additives. Free swelling index values showed a decrease of 92.6%. Direct shear tests on the cohesion value of Ankara clay have shown increases by multiples of 15.85 and 3.01 in internal friction angle values. The California bearing ratio has seen a more drastic increase in value (68.7 times for 25% fly ash mix).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE EFFECTS OF MINERAL WOOL FLY ASH ON COHESIVE SOIL STRENGTH BEHAVIOUR
    Zakarka, Mindaugas
    Skuodis, Sarunas
    Mackevicius, Rimantas
    Slizyte, Danute
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF ROAD AND BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2021, 16 (04): : 192 - 211
  • [2] Strength Behaviour of Dredged Soil Stabilized with Cement and Fly Ash
    Sultan, Razia
    Shah, M.Y.
    [J]. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 2023, 280 : 435 - 446
  • [3] Effects of fly ash characteristics and alkaline activator components on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar
    Hadi, Muhammad N. S.
    Al-Azzawi, Mustafa
    Yu, Tao
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 175 : 41 - 54
  • [4] The Effects of Sulfate on the Strength of Lime-fly Ash Stabilized Soil
    Hu, Zhonghui
    Jia, Zhirong
    Gao, Lei
    Yuan, Zhongyu
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (10): : 3669 - 3676
  • [5] Gypsum Induced Strength Behaviour of Fly Ash-Lime Stabilized Expansive Soil
    Sivapullaiah P.V.
    Jha A.K.
    [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2014, 32 (5) : 1261 - 1273
  • [6] Influence of Tyre Buffings and Cement on Strength Behaviour of Soil-Fly Ash Mixes
    Barman P.
    Singh B.
    [J]. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2017, 3 (1)
  • [7] Effects of the physicochemical properties of fly ash on the compressive strength of high-volume fly ash mortar
    Moon, Gyu Don
    Oh, Sungwoo
    Choi, Young Cheol
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 124 : 1072 - 1080
  • [8] Improving the engineering behaviour of residual soil with fly ash and treated natural fibres in alkaline condition
    Tan, Teingteing
    Huat, Bujang B. K.
    Anggraini, Vivi
    Shukla, Sanjay Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 15 (03) : 313 - 326
  • [9] Strength Behavior of Fly Ash-Stabilized Soil Reinforced with Coir Fibers in Alkaline Environment
    Tan, Teingteing
    Huat, Bujang B. K.
    Anggraini, Vivi
    Shukla, Sanjay Kumar
    Nahazanan, Haslinda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS, 2021, 18 (11) : 1556 - 1569
  • [10] Improvement of the Strength of Ankara Clay with Self-Cementing High Alkaline Fly Ash
    Binal, Adil
    Bas, Bertan
    Karamut, Orkun Rustu
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM 2016, WMCAUS 2016, 2016, 161 : 374 - 379