Total risk evaluation framework

被引:7
|
作者
Kosztyan, Zsolt Tibor [1 ]
Csizmadia, Tibor [2 ]
Kovacs, Zoltan [3 ]
Mihalcz, Istvan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pannonia, Dept Quantitat Methods, Veszprem, Hungary
[2] Univ Pannonia, Dept Management, Veszprem, Hungary
[3] Univ Pannonia, Dept Supply Chain, Veszprem, Hungary
关键词
Risk evaluation; Flexibility; Multi-level structure; FAILURE MODE; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; FUZZY; SAFETY; FMEA; PRIORITIZATION; INTEGRATION; AHP; INDUSTRY; PROPOSAL;
D O I
10.1108/IJQRM-05-2019-0167
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to generalize the traditional risk evaluation methods and to specify a multi-level risk evaluation framework, in order to prepare customized risk evaluation and to enable effectively integrating the elements of risk evaluation. Design/methodology/approach A real case study of an electric motor manufacturing company is presented to illustrate the advantages of this new framework compared to the traditional and fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) approaches. Findings The essence of the proposed total risk evaluation framework (TREF) is its flexible approach that enables the effective integration of firms' individual requirements by developing tailor-made organizational risk evaluation. Originality/value Increasing product/service complexity has led to increasingly complex yet unique organizational operations; as a result, their risk evaluation is a very challenging task. Distinct structures, characteristics and processes within and between organizations require a flexible yet robust approach of evaluating risks efficiently. Most recent risk evaluation approaches are considered to be inadequate due to the lack of flexibility and an inappropriate structure for addressing the unique organizational demands and contextual factors. To address this challenge effectively, taking a crucial step toward customization of risk evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 608
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A FRAMEWORK FOR RISK-EVALUATION
    VRIJLING, JK
    VANHENGEL, W
    HOUBEN, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1995, 43 (03) : 245 - 261
  • [2] Resource evaluation framework for total knee arthroplasty
    Ikuma, Laura
    Nahmens, Isabelina
    Ahmad, Amani
    Gudipudi, Yasaswi
    Dasa, Vinod
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2020, 33 (02) : 189 - 198
  • [3] Multiple dimension risk evaluation framework
    de Almeida-Filho, A. T.
    de Almeida, A. T.
    [J]. RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1049 - 1054
  • [4] A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR THE RISK MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
    Ivascu, L.
    Draghici, A.
    Fistis, G.
    Harpan, I.
    Farkas, Z.
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION RESEARCH - REGIONAL CONFERENCE AFRICA, EUROPE AND THE MIDDLE EAST AND 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY AND INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT (ICPR-AEM 2014), 2014, : 266 - 271
  • [5] Integrated framework of risk evaluation and risk allocation with bounded data
    Bae, Young Min
    Lee, Young Hoon
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (09) : 7853 - 7859
  • [6] EVALUATION OF THE RISK AND PREVENTION OF COMPLICATIONS OF TOTAL HIPARTHROPLASTY
    Alabut, A. V.
    Sikilinda, V. D.
    Chuyko, D. S.
    Gorbatenko, A. I.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 : S438 - S438
  • [7] EVALUATION OF OPERATIVE RISK IN TOTAL ARTHROPLASTY OF HIP
    POUSSET, MB
    GIRARD, M
    [J]. LYON MEDICAL, 1975, 233 (09): : 923 - 934
  • [8] Antitrust Risk in Practice Mergers: A Framework for Evaluation
    Lutes, Mark E.
    Wagner, Patricia M.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 9 (06) : 481 - 482
  • [9] A Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Emergency Risk Communications
    Savoia, Elena
    Lin, Leesa
    Gamhewage, Gaya M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 : S208 - S214
  • [10] A Risk Evaluation Framework for Service Level Agreements
    Yadranjiaghdam, Babak
    Hotwani, Komal
    Tabrizi, Nasseh
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (CIT), 2016, : 681 - 685