International trade, technological shocks and spillovers in the labour market: a GVAR analysis of the US manufacturing sector

被引:15
|
作者
Hiebert, P. [1 ]
Vansteenkiste, I. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] European Cent Bank, D-60311 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Econ Studies, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
IMPULSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE MODELS; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; GLOBALIZATION; COMPETITION; EMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1080/00036840801964864
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We empirically analyse the response of labour market related variables in the US manufacturing sector to various shocks, notably to trade openness and technology, as well as examining spillovers from industry-specific labour market shocks. The econometric approach involves an application of the recently developed Global Vector Autoregression methodology of Dees et al. (2007) to 12 manufacturing industries over the period 1977-2003. The framework allows us to analyse the response of a standard set of labour-market related variables (employment, real compensation, productivity and capital stock) to exogenous factors (a sector-specific measure of trade openness, a common technology and oil price shock), along with industry spillovers using specific measures of manufacturing-wide variables for each sector. Generalized impulse responses indicate that increased trade openness negatively affects real compensation, has negligible employment effects and leads to higher labour productivity. These impacts, however, are relatively weaker than those induced by technology shocks, with the latter positively and significantly affecting both real compensation and employment. There is also evidence of positive spillovers across industries from sector-specific employment and productivity shocks. Impact elasticities suggest strong intra-sectoral linkages for employment and capital stock formation, contrasting with weak linkages for what concerns real compensation and productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:3045 / 3066
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technological Leaders, Laggards and Spillovers: A Network GVAR Analysis
    Drivas, Kyriakos
    Economidou, Claire
    Konstantakis, Konstantinos N.
    Michaelides, Panayotis G.
    [J]. OPEN ECONOMIES REVIEW, 2022, 33 (02) : 231 - 269
  • [2] Technological Leaders, Laggards and Spillovers: A Network GVAR Analysis
    Kyriakos Drivas
    Claire Economidou
    Konstantinos N. Konstantakis
    Panayotis G. Michaelides
    [J]. Open Economies Review, 2022, 33 : 231 - 269
  • [3] International spillovers of labour market policies
    Dao, Mai Chi
    [J]. OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2013, 65 (02): : 417 - 446
  • [4] The impact of trade intensity and Market characteristics on asymmetric volatility, spillovers and asymmetric spillovers: Evidence from the response of international stock markets to US shocks
    Newaz, Mohammed Khaleq
    Park, Jin Suk
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2019, 71 : 79 - 94
  • [5] Financial market spillovers of US monetary policy shocks
    Ha, Jongrim
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 29 (05) : 1221 - 1274
  • [6] National Industry Trade Shocks, Local Labour Markets, and Agglomeration Spillovers
    Helm, Ines
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2020, 87 (03): : 1399 - 1431
  • [7] International Spillovers from US Fiscal Policy Shocks
    Nicar, Stephen B.
    [J]. OPEN ECONOMIES REVIEW, 2015, 26 (05) : 1081 - 1097
  • [8] Trade shocks and the shifting landscape of US manufacturing
    Eriksson, Katherine
    Russ, Katheryn N.
    Shambaugh, Jay C.
    Xu, Minfei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2021, 111
  • [9] The sensitivity of oil price shocks to preexisting market conditions: A GVAR analysis
    Considine, Jennifer
    Hatipoglu, Emre
    Aldayel, Abdullah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMODITY MARKETS, 2022, 27
  • [10] The sensitivity of oil price shocks to preexisting market conditions: A GVAR analysis
    Considine, Jennifer
    Hatipoglu, Emre
    Aldayel, Abdullah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMODITY MARKETS, 2022, 27