A Comparative Study of GPR Reconstruction Approaches for Landmine Detection

被引:40
|
作者
Gonzalez-Huici, Maria A. [1 ]
Catapano, Ilaria [2 ]
Soldovieri, Francesco [2 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst High Frequency Phys & Radar Tech, Dept Cognit Radar, D-53343 Wachtberg, Germany
[2] Natl Res Council Italy CNR, Inst Electromagnet Sensing Environm IREA, I-80121 Naples, Italy
关键词
Ground penetrating radar (GPR); landmine detection; reconstruction algorithms; MICROWAVE TOMOGRAPHY; MIGRATION; OBJECTS;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2321276
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper compares the performance of three reconstruction techniques frequently applied to process ground penetrating radar (GPR) data in the specific context of landmine detection: 1) Stolt migration, 2) backprojection (BP), and 3) microwave tomographic inversion (MWT). The detection results provided by these algorithms are contrasted with the ones obtained from typically adopted GPR data filtering procedures. To carry out the analysis, we use experimental data collected at a specifically prepared test field, where different targets were buried at shallow depths in inhomogeneous soil. The efficiency of the investigated approaches is quantitatively evaluated in terms of detection accuracies (ROC curves) obtained applying a single pixel-based and an averaged energy detection algorithm. Based on this analysis, we found that the MWT outperforms the other reconstruction algorithms for the smallest mines, which are the most difficult to detect. On the other hand, MWT and BP reconstruction techniques achieve comparable performances against medium mines, and do not improve the outcome in case of big mines with respect to the filtering approaches. Finally, Stolt migration produces the worst results for both medium and small mines.
引用
收藏
页码:4869 / 4878
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GPR imaging approaches for buried plastic landmine detection
    Feng, HH
    Castañon, DA
    Karl, WC
    Miller, EL
    [J]. DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS V, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 4038 : 1485 - 1496
  • [2] Comparative Analysis of Short and Long GPR Pulses for Landmine Detection
    Temlioglu, Eyyup
    Nazli, Hakki
    Aksoy, Serkan
    [J]. DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XXI, 2016, 9823
  • [3] A review of GPR for landmine detection
    Daniels, David J.
    [J]. SENSING AND IMAGING, 2006, 7 (03): : 90 - 123
  • [4] A Review of Landmine Detection using GPR
    Daniels, David J.
    [J]. 2008 EUROPEAN RADAR CONFERENCE, 2008, : 280 - 283
  • [5] A Comparative Study of Landmine Detection Techniques
    Kasban, H.
    Zahran, O.
    Elaraby, Sayed M.
    El-Kordy, M.
    El-Samie, F. E. Abd
    [J]. SENSING AND IMAGING, 2010, 11 (03): : 89 - 112
  • [6] Landmine detection by a broadband GPR system
    Sato, M
    Fang, GY
    Zeng, ZF
    [J]. IGARSS 2003: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS I - VII, PROCEEDINGS: LEARNING FROM EARTH'S SHAPES AND SIZES, 2003, : 758 - 760
  • [7] Comparative analysis of UWB deconvolution and feature extraction algorithms for GPR landmine detection
    Savelyev, TG
    Sato, M
    [J]. DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS IX, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 5415 : 1008 - 1018
  • [8] Antenna system for UWB GPR for landmine detection
    Yarovoy, A
    Schukin, A
    Kaploun, I
    Ligthart, L
    [J]. DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS VI, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 4394 : 692 - 699
  • [9] Data processing for a landmine detection dedicated GPR
    Groenenboom, J
    Yarovoy, AG
    [J]. GPR 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND PENETRATING RADAR, 2000, 4084 : 867 - 871
  • [10] Experimental evaluation of an array GPR for landmine detection
    Savelyev, Timofey
    Yarovoy, Alexander
    Ligthart, Leo
    [J]. 2007 EUROPEAN RADAR CONFERENCE, 2007, : 219 - 222