Clinical efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is an anatomical double - bundle or anatomical single - bundle better? A meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Lei [1 ]
Jin, Zhigao [1 ]
Li, Liubing [1 ]
Lu, Zhengfeng [1 ]
Kou, Yu [2 ]
Mao, Huan [3 ]
Hou, Yaxin [2 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Orthopaed, 1055 Sanxiang Rd, Suzhou 215004, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Med Coll, 199 Renai Rd, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Inst Biol Sci, 999 Xian Rd, Chengdu 611756, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; anatomic; single-bundle; double-bundle; meta-analysis; PATELLAR TENDON; HAMSTRING TENDON; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; INJURY; AUTOGRAFT; INCISION; GRAFTS; JOINT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Purpose: In recent years, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technology has developed rapidly and patients report better satisfaction relating to the clinical efficacy. However surgeons remain unsure whether the use of anatomical double-bundle reconstruction is superior to the single bundle. This review aims to compare the clinical outcomes between anatomical double bundle ACL reconstruction (ADB-ACLR) and anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction (ASB-ACLR) in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods: A search was performed in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis and all of them were Level I evidence. The comparative outcomes were instrument-measured anterior laxity, Lachman test, pivot shift, clinical outcomes including objective/subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale and complication rates of graft failure, including early osteoarthritis and extension/flexion deficits. Results: A total of 13 RCT articles and 1887 patients are included. ADB-ACLR led to more rotational stability measured by pivot shift with odds ratio (OR) of 1.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18 to 2.45) with heterogeneity (P = 0.01 I-2 = 50%) and revealed statistical significance in a subjective IKDC score with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.17 (95% CI = 0.02 to 0.31, P = 0.15 I-2 = 31%) compared with ASB-ACLR. Conclusion: Patients who underwent ADB-ACLR showed better rotational stability, a higher subjective IKDC sore and less flexion deficits compared with ASB-ACLR with no human differences. By using ADB-ACLR, Asian patients had higher Tegner activity scale while American and European patients showed no difference. Other comparative outcomes were not significantly different between ADB-ACLR, ASB-ACLR and human race.
引用
收藏
页码:11357 / 11371
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Carmont M.R.
    Scheffler S.
    Spalding T.
    Brown J.
    Sutton P.M.
    [J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2011, 4 (2) : 65 - 72
  • [2] Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Zelle, BA
    Brucker, PU
    Feng, MT
    Fu, FH
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [3] Anatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Boris A. Zelle
    Peter U. Brucker
    Matthew T. Feng
    Freddie H. Fu
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2006, 36 : 99 - 108
  • [4] Single-bundle or double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis
    Li, Yu-Lin
    Ning, Guang-Zhi
    Wu, Qiang
    Wu, Qiu-Li
    Li, Yan
    Hao, Yan
    Feng, Shi-Qing
    [J]. KNEE, 2014, 21 (01): : 28 - 37
  • [5] Anatomical Single-Bundle Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Zhao, Jinzhong
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2020, 9 (09): : E1275 - E1282
  • [6] An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:: Single bundle versus anatomical double bundle techniques
    Sasaki, Sandra Umeda
    Mota E Albuquerque, Roberto Freire da
    Martins Pereira, Cesar Augusto
    Gouveia, Guilherme Simoes
    Rodrigues Vilela, Julio Cesar
    Alcaras, Fabio de Lima
    [J]. CLINICS, 2008, 63 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [7] Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Alomari, Mohammed S.
    Ghaddaf, Abdullah A.
    Abdulhamid, Ahmed S.
    Alshehri, Mohammed S.
    Ashraf, Mujeeb
    Alharbi, Hatem H.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 56 (10) : 1669 - 1684
  • [8] Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mohammed S. Alomari
    Abdullah A. Ghaddaf
    Ahmed S. Abdulhamid
    Mohammed S. Alshehri
    Mujeeb Ashraf
    Hatem H. Alharbi
    [J]. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2022, 56 : 1669 - 1684
  • [9] Anatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Augmentation
    Iwaasa, Tomoya
    Tensho, Keiji
    Takahashi, Tsuneari
    Koyama, Suguru
    Shimodaira, Hiroki
    Horiuchi, Hiroshi
    Takahashi, Jun
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2023, 12 (06): : E931 - E936
  • [10] The Effect of Central Anatomical Single-Bundle versus Anatomical Double-Bundle Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament on Knee Stability. A Clinical Study
    Komzak, M.
    Hart, R.
    Smid, P.
    Puskeiler, M.
    [J]. ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2014, 81 (04) : 276 - 280