COMPARISON OF VARIOUS DEMS FOR HEIGHT ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OVER DIFFERENT TERRAINS OF INDIA

被引：2

作者：

Vaka, Divya Sekhar ^{[1
]}

Kumar, Vineet ^{[1
]}

Rao, Y. S. ^{[1
]}

Deo, Rinki ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Studies Resources Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

[2] TERI Sch Adv Studies, New Delhi, India

来源：

2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019) | 2019年

关键词：

TanDEM-X DEM; vertical accuracy; LiDAR; NASADEM; ICESat; SRTM; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL;

D O I：

10.1109/igarss.2019.8898492

中图分类号：

P [天文学、地球科学];

学科分类号：

07 ;

摘要：

In this paper, the height accuracy of various DEMs such as TanDEM-X Global DEM, newly released TanDEM-X 90 m DEM, TanDEM-X ascending or descending DEM, SRTM 30 m, 90 m DEMs, provisional version of the NASADEM, and the aerial LiDAR DEM are assessed over three different Indian terrains. The test sites deal with flat terrain, flat terrain with forest cover and hilly terrain conditions. The accuracy is assessed by computing statistics of the elevation difference between the reference data (ICESat or GPS) and other DEMs. The RMSE for TanDEM-X Global DEMs is less than the mission specification of 10 m. The RMSE over flat terrain (Bihar) is between 1.43 and 5.34 m. For KWLS (flat forested terrain) it ranges from 5.16 to 7.54 m, and for the rugged Himalayan test site Manali the RMSE ranges from 7.41 to 17.15 m. The provisional version of the NASADEM shows better vertical accuracy than the existing SRTM DEMs.

引用

页码：1998 / 2001

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] COMPARISON OF TANDEM-X AND CARTOSAT-1 STEREO DEMS OVER DIFFERENT TERRAINS OF INDIA
Deo, Rinki
Jain, Minal
Rao, Y. S.
[J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 6484 - 6487
[2] Vertical Accuracy Assessment of TanDEM-X Global DEM over various Indian Terrains
Vaka, Divya Sekhar
Rao, Y. S.
[J]. 2019 URSI ASIA-PACIFIC RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE (AP-RASC), 2019,
[3] Comparison of Different Antenna Arrays with Various Height
Chen, Chien-Hung
Hung, Chi-Jie
Chiu, Chien-Ching
Liao, Shu-Han
[J]. E-INFRASTRUCTURE AND E-SERVICES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (AFRICOMM 2016), 2018, 208 : 199 - 205
[4] Accuracy validation and bias assessment for various multi-sensor open-source DEMs in part of the Karakoram region
Kumar, Anant
Negi, H. S.
Kumar, Kamal
Shekhar, Chander
[J]. REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2020, 11 (10) : 893 - 902
[5] Direct Measurement of Tree Height Provides Different Results on the Assessment of LiDAR Accuracy
Sibona, Emanuele
Vitali, Alessandro
Meloni, Fabio
Caffo, Lucia
Dotta, Alberto
Lingua, Emanuele
Motta, Renzo
Garbarino, Matteo
[J]. FORESTS, 2017, 8 (01):
[6] Accuracy Assessment of DEMs in Different Topographic Complexity Based on an Optimum Number of GCP Formulation and Error Propagation Analysis
Nadi, Saeed
Shojaei, Davood
Ghiasi, Yusof
[J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (01)
[7] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ACCURACY IN A BUILDING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT: A CASE STUDY ON THE THREE DIFFERENT ACCURACY OF INVENTORY
Takano, Atsushi
Kuittinen, Matti
[J]. SUSTAINABLE BUILDING AND REFURBISHMENT FOR NEXT GENERATIONS, 2013, : 801 - 804
[8] DEM resolution influences on peak flow prediction: a comparison of two different based DEMs through various rescaling techniques
Suliman, Ali H. Ahmed
Gumindoga, W.
Awchi, Taymoor A.
Katimon, Ayob
[J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 36 (07) : 803 - 819
[9] VERTICAL ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF 30-M RESOLUTION ALOS, ASTER, AND SRTM GLOBAL DEMS OVER NORTHEASTERN MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES
Santillan, J. R.
Makinano-Santillan, M.
[J]. XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION IV, 2016, 41 (B4): : 149 - 156
[10] ASSESSMENT OF CANOPY AND GROUND HEIGHT ACCURACY FROM GEDI LIDAR OVER STEEP MOUNTAIN AREAS
Kutchartt, E.
Pedron, M.
Pirotti, F.
[J]. XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS: IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION III, 2022, 5-3 : 431 - 438

← 1 2 3 4 5 →