Beach pollution from marine litter: Analysis with the DPSIR framework (driver, pressure, state, impact, response) in Tuscany, Italy

被引:14
|
作者
Federigi, Ileana [1 ]
Balestri, Elena [2 ]
Castelli, Alberto [2 ]
De Battisti, Davide [2 ,3 ]
Maltagliati, Ferruccio [2 ]
Menicagli, Virginia [2 ,4 ]
Verani, Marco [1 ]
Lardicci, Claudio [4 ,5 ]
Carducci, Annalaura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Biol, Lab Hyg & Environm Virol, Via S Zeno 35-39, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Biol, Unit Marine Biol & Ecol, Via Derna 1, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Biol, Chioggia Hydrobiol Stn Umberto DAncona, Chioggia, Italy
[4] Ctr Instrument Sharing Univ Pisa CISUP, Pisa, Italy
[5] Univ Pisa, Dept Earth Sci, via S Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
关键词
DPSIR; Beach cast; Beach litter; Beach litter management; Public health; Microbial pollution; COASTAL; QUALITY; DEBRIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109395
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Beaches are affected by the accumulation of natural and anthropogenic material; however, this environmental issue has not yet been explored from a One Health perspective. In this paper, the conceptual framework of DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Response) was used to understand the beach-stranded material issue in a systemic way and a data-based classification for some environmental indicators was developed to support the DPSIR analysis. The model was applied to an Italian coastal municipality as a case study, through the collection of data from a variety of data sources: publicly accessible database, data from a stakeholders' network (i.e., coastal authority, solid waste company, sewerage company, drainage consortium), and fieldwork consisting in micro-biological analysis of stranded material and underlying sand, visual census of macrolitter along beach and waterways. In the study area, solid wastes production was a high pressure (768 kg/capita/year), but in situ visual observations of floating wastes at the outlet of the canals revealed that the contribution of local waterways to marine litter was negligible, thus suggesting the effectiveness of the measures adopted along local waterways by the drainage consortium (i.e., grids at the drainage pumping stations). Nevertheless, very high quantity of anthropogenic wastes was counted during the beach litter surveys (603 items/100 m), probably as a result of coastal current pathway that transported material from major watercourses (> 100 km(2) drainage basin size; 23 items/h). On the contrary, local sewage production represented a very high pressure (> 33,000 m(3)/km) that impacted on the microbiological quality of the stranded material with moderate to high level of fecal bacteria indicators detected in the beach cast. The underlying sand was affected by such contamination, with most of the sample within the provisional limit set by WHO for enterococci in beach sand (60 CFU/g) that was associated to a health risk of < 5 % of gastroenteritis attributable to accidental ingestion of sand; nevertheless, some enterococci peak values (980 MPN/g) could be associated to a health risk for gastroenteritis > 10 %. The beach-stranded material was collected without separating the sand, with annual quantity of 1,243 kg/m, that was processed in a dedicated facility allowing to recover up to 98 % of sand and biomass after the treatment, with moderate expenditure for the coastal municipality (22 euro /m). Overall, this study allowed to better figure out the cause-effect relationships underlying the accumulation of stranded material along shoreline and the effectiveness of the management practices toward beach-stranded material. Therefore, the usage of the DPSIR framework as structuring model to understand the problem of stranded material could be useful for beach managers and administrators, and its adoption within beach management programs is worth for improving beach quality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] The Environmental Impact of E-Waste Microplastics: A Systematic Review and Analysis Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) Framework
    Prata, Joana C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 11 (02)
  • [2] Assessment of environmental degradation in two coastal communities of Ghana using Driver Pressure State Impact Response (DPSIR) framework
    Faseyi, Charles Abimbola
    Miyittah, Michael K.
    Yafetto, Levi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 342
  • [3] Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) Analysis and Risk Assessment for Soil Compaction-A European Perspective
    Schjonning, Per
    van den Akker, Jan J. H.
    Keller, Thomas
    Greve, Mogens H.
    Lamande, Mathieu
    Simojoki, Asko
    Stettler, Matthias
    Arvidsson, Johan
    Breuning-Madsen, Henrik
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 133, 2015, 133 : 183 - 237
  • [4] Environmental complaint insights through text mining based on the driver, pressure, state, impact, and response (DPSIR) framework: Evidence from an Italian environmental agency
    Manservisi, Fabiana
    Banzi, Michele
    Tonelli, Tomaso
    Veronesi, Paolo
    Ricci, Susanna
    Distante, Damiano
    Faralli, Stefano
    Bortone, Giuseppe
    [J]. REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 4 (03) : 261 - 281
  • [5] Environmental complaint insights through text mining based on the driver, pressure, state, impact, and response(DPSIR) framework: Evidence from an Italian environmental agency
    Fabiana MANSERVISI
    Michele BANZI
    Tomaso TONELLI
    Paolo VERONESI
    Susanna RICCI
    Damiano DISTANTE
    Stefano FARALLI
    Giuseppe BORTONE
    [J]. Regional Sustainability, 2023, 4 (03) : 261 - 281
  • [6] Assessing the environmental impacts of high-altitude agriculture in Taiwan: A Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework and spatial emergy synthesis
    Lin, Ying-Chen
    Huang, Shu-Li
    Budd, William W.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 32 : 42 - 50
  • [7] Vulnerability assessment of wetland landscape ecosystem services using driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model
    Malekmohammadi, B.
    Jahanishakib, F.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 82 : 293 - 303
  • [8] Re-imagining the driver–pressure–state–impact–response framework from an equity and inclusive development perspective
    Joyeeta Gupta
    Joeri Scholtens
    Leisa Perch
    Irene Dankelman
    Joni Seager
    Fülöp Sánder
    Michael Stanley-Jones
    Isabell Kempf
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2020, 15 : 503 - 520
  • [9] Re-imagining the driver-pressure-state-impact-response framework from an equity and inclusive development perspective
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    Scholtens, Joeri
    Perch, Leisa
    Dankelman, Irene
    Seager, Joni
    Sander, Fulop
    Stanley-Jones, Michael
    Kempf, Isabell
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (02) : 503 - 520