Systematic review of methodology and reporting quality of global guidelines on fever in children

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Chuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Lingli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qiong, Liao [3 ,4 ]
Zeng, Linan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Di [5 ]
Qin, Fang [5 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Evidence Based Pharm Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pediat, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
AGREE II; clinical practice guideline; fever in children; reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare statement; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; HEALTH-CARE; MANAGEMENT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000028021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the global clinical practice guidelines on fever in children. We also aimed to select a guideline with good methodology and reporting quality to provide scientific reference for diagnosis and treatment of fever in children. Methods: The Chinese and English databases Embase, PubMed, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, clinical guides, and the website of the Department of Public Health Administration were retrieved up to January 2020. The clinical practice guidelines on fever in children were included. The AGREE II instrument and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare statement were used to evaluate the methodology and reporting quality of the guidelines. Results: Eight clinical guidelines for fever in children were included. Methodological quality assessment showed that the recommendation level of ISP, South Africa, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, China, and American College of Emergency Physicians were grade B (recommended with modification), while that of American Academy of Pediatrics, New South Wales, and South Australia was grade C recommendation (not recommended). No grade A recommendation guideline was found. The reporting quality from higher to lower was National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Chinese guideline, American College of Emergency Physicians, ISP, South Africa, New South Wales, South Australia, and American Academy of Pediatrics. The guideline recommendations were similar in various countries, but they were slightly different in various aspects, including body temperature measurement and the timing of drug administration. Conclusion: There are limitations in the methodology and reporting quality of all eight global guidelines on fever in children. For future development of these guidelines, attention should be paid to improving applicability of the guidelines in terms of methodology. Additionally, the principles and explanations for formation of recommendations should be described, as well as the limitations of the reporting guideline in detail in terms of the reporting quality. Treatments of fever in children are similar in different countries, but there are still differences that require further research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Chen, Yaolong
    Yang, Nan
    Deng, Wei
    Wang, Qi
    Li, Nan
    Yao, Liang
    Wei, Dang
    Chen, Gen
    Yang, Kehu
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [2] Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review
    Xiaoqin Wang
    Yaolong Chen
    Nan Yang
    Wei Deng
    Qi Wang
    Nan Li
    Liang Yao
    Dang Wei
    Gen Chen
    Kehu Yang
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15
  • [3] Quality of guidelines for appendicitis in children: A systematic review
    Wang, Xing
    Liu, Yang
    Yan, Meili
    Gao, Mingtai
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (11) : 2514 - 2516
  • [4] Guidelines for the symptomatic management of fever in children: systematic review of the literature and quality appraisal with AGREE II
    Chiappini, Elena
    Bortone, Barbara
    Galli, Luisa
    de Martino, Maurizio
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07):
  • [5] A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment
    Belloti, Joao Carlos
    Okamura, Aldo
    Scheeren, Jordana
    Faloppa, Flavio
    de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [6] Reporting quality evaluation of the stroke clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
    Shuya Lu
    Xufei Luo
    Xiaojia Ni
    Haoxuan Li
    Miaomiao Meng
    Yefeng Cai
    Yunlan Liu
    Mengjuan Ren
    Yanrui Sun
    Yaolong Chen
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [7] Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
    Zhang, Shu
    Wu, Lei
    Wang, Yang
    Zhou, Qi
    Luo, Xufei
    Mathew, Joseph L.
    Wang, Qi
    Song, Yang
    Chen, Yaolong
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (15)
  • [8] Reporting quality evaluation of the stroke clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
    Lu, Shuya
    Luo, Xufei
    Ni, Xiaojia
    Li, Haoxuan
    Meng, Miaomiao
    Cai, Yefeng
    Liu, Yunlan
    Ren, Mengjuan
    Sun, Yanrui
    Chen, Yaolong
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [9] Quality and reporting of clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment: A systematic review
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Mignini, Luciano
    Martin-Diaz, Manuel
    Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
    Saeed Khan, Khalid
    [J]. BREAST, 2020, 53 : 201 - 211
  • [10] Symptomatic fever management in children: A systematic review of national and international guidelines
    Green, Cari
    Krafft, Hanno
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Martin, David
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):