Knowledge management approaches of small and medium-sized firms: a cluster analysis

被引:35
|
作者
Alexandru, Vlad Andrei [1 ]
Bolisani, Ettore [2 ]
Andrei, Andreia Gabriela [3 ]
Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro, Juan [4 ]
Martinez Martinez, Aurora [4 ]
Paiola, Marco [5 ]
Scarso, Enrico [2 ]
Vatamanescu, Elena-Madalina [6 ]
Zieba, Malgorzata [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Econ, Varese, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Management & Engn, Padua, Italy
[3] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Iasi, Romania
[4] Polytech Univ Cartagena, Fac Business Sci, Cartagena, Colombia
[5] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management, Padua, Italy
[6] Natl Univ Polit Studies & Publ Adm, Bucharest, Romania
[7] Gdansk Univ Technol, Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Knowledge management; SMEs; KIBS; Strategic adoption; Cluster analysis; INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; SMES; INNOVATION; EMERGENT; PERFORMANCE; NETWORKS; CULTURE; SPAIN;
D O I
10.1108/K-03-2019-0211
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to categorise the approaches to knowledge management (KM) by companies. In the literature, there is no consensus on a universal or "best" approach to KM. Especially, this paper singles out and discusses the variegated features that characterise the implementation of KM by small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) having different characteristics. Design/methodology/approach A cluster analysis was used to detect the possible distinct traits of companies that have different approaches to KM. The unit of analysis is represented by small- and medium-sized knowledge intensive business services (KIBS) firms. Data were collected by means of an extensive survey of 223 companies in different European countries and sectors. Findings Three clusters were identified: Companies showing a relative "unconscious" attention to KM and implementing KM practices without particular awareness; Companies adopting a more conscious approach and using a significant number of KM practices; and companies with a marginal propensity towards KM. Originality/value The topic of KM approaches by small companies is still underdeveloped in the literature. Also, the paper proposes a multi-contextual investigation that makes it possible to highlight the transversality of KM approaches across different countries or sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 87
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INNOVATION MANAGEMENT IN SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED FIRMS
    THOM, N
    [J]. MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 1990, 30 (02): : 181 - 192
  • [2] Knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises
    Bodrow, Wladimir
    [J]. Knowledge Enterprise: Intelligent Strategies in Product Design, Manufacturing, and Management, 2006, 207 : 41 - 53
  • [3] Knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises
    Chan, Ivy
    Chao, Chee-Kwong
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2008, 51 (04) : 83 - 88
  • [4] The Internationalization of Small and Medium-Sized Firms
    Dirk De Clercq
    Harry J. Sapienza
    Hans Crijns
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2005, 24 : 409 - 419
  • [5] The internationalization of small and medium-sized firms
    De Clercq, D
    Sapienza, HJ
    Crijns, H
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (04) : 409 - 419
  • [6] MANAGEMENT OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRMS - DISCUSSION
    GREULICH, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1984, 110 (01): : 61 - 61
  • [7] MANAGEMENT OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRMS - CLOSURE
    GIBERSON, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1984, 110 (01): : 61 - 62
  • [8] The Benefits of Knowledge Management in Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises
    Edvardsson, Ingi Runar
    Durst, Susanne
    [J]. WORLD CONGRESS ON ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLITICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 81 : 351 - 354
  • [9] EVALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES
    Kulej-Dudek, E.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2013, 8 : 167 - 173
  • [10] Knowledge Management in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises
    DiPasquale, Joanna
    McInerney, Claire
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 9 (04) : 341 - 353