Between-source modelling for likelihood ratio computation in forensic biometric recognition

被引:0
|
作者
Ramos-Castro, D [1 ]
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J
Champod, C
Fierrez-Aguilar, J
Ortega-Garcia, J
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Escuela Politecn Super, ATVS Speech & Signal Proc Grp, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Lausanne, Ecole Sci Criminelles, Inst Police Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, the use of biometric systems in forensic applications is reviewed. Main differences between the aim of commercial biometric systems and forensic reporting are highlighted, showing that commercial biometric systems are not suited to directly report results to a court of law. We propose the use of a Bayesian approach for forensic reporting, in which the forensic scientist has to assess a meaningful value, in the form of a likelihood ratio (LR). This value assist the court in their decision making in a clear way, and can be computed using scores coming from any biometric system, with independence of the biometric discipline. LR computation in biometric systems is reviewed, and statistical assumptions regarding estimations involved in the process are addressed. The paper is focused in handling small sample size effects in such estimations, presenting novel experiments using a fingerprint and a voice biometric system.
引用
收藏
页码:1080 / 1089
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Gaussian Mixture Models of Between-Source Variation for Likelihood Ratio Computation from Multivariate Data
    Franco-Pedroso, Javier
    Ramos, Daniel
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [2] Sampling variability in forensic likelihood-ratio computation: A simulation study
    Ali, Tauseef
    Spreeuwers, Luuk
    Veldhuis, Raymond
    Meuwly, Didier
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2015, 55 (06) : 499 - 508
  • [3] Effect of Calibration Data on Forensic Likelihood Ratio from a Face Recognition System
    Ali, Tauseef
    Spreeuwers, Luuk
    Veldhuis, Raymond
    Meuwly, Didier
    2013 IEEE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMETRICS: THEORY, APPLICATIONS AND SYSTEMS (BTAS), 2013,
  • [4] Forensic Speaker Recognition in Chinese: A Multivariate Likelihood Ratio Discrimination on |i| and |y|
    Zhang, Cuiling
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    Rose, Philip
    INTERSPEECH 2008: 9TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2008, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1937 - +
  • [5] EMPIRICAL VALIDATION OF LIKELIHOOD RATIO METHODS - A CASE STUDY IN FORENSIC SPEAKER RECOGNITION
    Guapo, Filipe
    Correia, Paulo
    Meuwly, Didier
    van der Vloed, David
    2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BIOMETRICS AND FORENSICS (IWBF), 2016,
  • [6] ANTI-FORENSIC RESISTANT LIKELIHOOD RATIO COMPUTATION: A CASE STUDY USING FINGERPRINT BIOMETRICS
    Poh, Norman
    Suki, Nik
    Iorliam, Aamo
    Ho, Anthony T. S.
    2014 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2014, : 1377 - 1381
  • [7] A likelihood ratio-based approach for improved source attribution in microbiological forensic investigations
    Lindgren, Petter
    Myrtennas, Kerstin
    Forsman, Mats
    Johansson, Anders
    Stenberg, Per
    Nordgaard, Anders
    Ahlinder, Jon
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 302
  • [8] Improving biometric recognition by means of score ratio, the likelihood ratio for non-probabilistic classifiers. A benchmarking study
    Vivaracho-Pascual, Carlos
    Simon-Hurtado, Arancha
    Manso-Martinez, Esperanza
    IET BIOMETRICS, 2021, 10 (02) : 127 - 141
  • [9] A Problem in Forensic Science Highlighting the Differences between the Bayes Factor and Likelihood Ratio
    Ommen, Danica M.
    Saunders, Christopher P.
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 36 (03) : 344 - 359
  • [10] Likelihood ratio calculation in acoustic-phonetic forensic voice comparison: Comparison of three statistical modelling approaches
    Enzinger, Ewald
    17TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2016), VOLS 1-5: UNDERSTANDING SPEECH PROCESSING IN HUMANS AND MACHINES, 2016, : 535 - 539