The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Lijin [1 ]
Wu, Bin [1 ]
Zha, Zhenlei [1 ]
Zhao, Hu [1 ]
Yuan, Jun [1 ]
Feng, Yejun [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Coll Med, Affiliated Jiang Yin Hosp, Dept Urol, Jiangyin, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
lymphovascular invasion; upper tract urinary carcinoma; radical nephroureterectomy; prognosis; meta-analysis; TRANSAMINASE/ALANINE TRANSAMINASE RATIO; PREDICTS POOR-PROGNOSIS; UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY; ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; WORSE PROGNOSIS; CANCER; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.00487
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contemporary role of LVI using systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for all reports published up to July 2019. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were conducted to assess the association between LVI and oncological outcomes and clinicopathological features. Results: Our meta-analysis included 31 eligible studies containing 14,653 patients with UTUC (81-1,363 per study). Our results indicated a significant correlation of LVI with worse cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.55, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.46, p < 0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.25, p = 0.047), and recurrence (HR = 1.23, p = 0.026). LVI was also correlated with advanced tumor stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR = 7.63, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (3 vs. 1/2: OR = 5.61, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no: OR = 4.95, p < 0.001), carcinoma in situ (yes vs. no: OR = 1.92, p < 0.001), and positive surgical margin (yes vs. no: OR = 4.38, p < 0.001), but not related to gender (male vs. female: OR = 0.98, p = 0.825), and multifocality (multifocal vs. unifocal: OR = 1.09, p = 0.555). The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that LVI was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features. LVI may serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with UTUC after RNU.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Wen
    Sun, Lijiang
    Guan, Fengju
    Wang, Fangming
    Zhang, Guiming
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2019, 2019
  • [2] Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic factor in the upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Jeong, Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Lee, Sang Eun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (12) : 2665 - 2680
  • [3] The impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An extensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stangl-Kremser, Judith
    Muto, Gianluca
    Grosso, Antonio Andrea
    Briganti, Alberto
    Comperat, Eva
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Remzi, Mesut
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Soria, Francesco
    Albisinni, Simone
    Roupret, Morgan
    Shariat, Shahrokh Francois
    Minervini, Andrea
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Moschini, Marco
    Cimadamore, Alessia
    Mari, Andrea
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (06) : 243 - 261
  • [4] Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract
    Hong, B
    Park, S
    Song, C
    Kim, JB
    Kim, CS
    Ahn, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 465 - 466
  • [5] Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract
    Merlin, Federica
    Riolfi, Mirko
    Sava, Teodoro
    Consoli, Francesca
    Manno, Pietro
    Griso, Claudia
    Porcaro, Antonio
    Ghimenton, Claudio
    Comunale, Luigi
    Cetto, Gianluigi
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 152 - 152
  • [6] Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract
    Hong, B
    Park, S
    Hong, JH
    Kim, CS
    Ro, JY
    Ahn, H
    UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) : 692 - 696
  • [7] The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Yi
    Huang, Hai
    Pan, Xiu-Wu
    Xu, Dan-Feng
    Cui, Xin-Gang
    Chen, Jie
    Hong, Yi
    Gao, Yi
    Yin, Lei
    Ye, Jian-Qing
    Li, Lin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2016, 18 (05) : 780 - 785
  • [8] Prognostic Role of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract
    Mellouli, Manel
    Charfi, Slim
    Smaoui, Walid
    Kallel, Rim
    Khabir, Abdelmajid
    Bouacida, Mehdi
    Mhiri, Mohamed Nabil
    Boudawara, Tahya Sellami
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (05) : 5008 - 5012
  • [9] Prognostic Value of Preoperative Hydronephrosis in Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ye, Tao
    Yang, Xiaoqi
    Lv, Peng
    Liu, Haoran
    Ye, Zhangqun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [10] Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ma, Runzhuo
    Liu, Zenan
    Cheng, Yinchu
    Zhou, Pengxiang
    Pan, Yuting
    Bi, Hai
    Tao, Liyuan
    Yang, Bin
    Xia, Haizhui
    Zhu, Xuehua
    He, Jide
    He, Wei
    Wang, Guoliang
    Huang, Yi
    Ma, Lulin
    Lu, Jian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 42 : 19 - 29