Effectiveness and Safety of Acupuncture for Migraine: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

被引:39
|
作者
Li, Yu-Xi [1 ]
Xiao, Xi-li [2 ]
Zhong, Dong-Ling [3 ]
Luo, Liao-Jun [1 ]
Yang, Han [1 ]
Zhou, Jun [1 ]
He, Ming-Xing [3 ]
Shi, Li-Hong [3 ]
Li, Juan [3 ]
Zheng, Hui [1 ]
Jin, Rong-Jiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 3, Sch Acupuncture Moxibust & Tuina, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Sch Hlth Preservat & Rehabil, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT | 2020年 / 2020卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EPISODIC MIGRAINE; PROPHYLAXIS; QUALITY; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1155/2020/3825617
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Migraine is a common neurological disease, which burdens individuals and society all over the world. Acupuncture, an important method in Traditional Chinese Medicine, is widely used in clinical practice as a treatment for migraine. Several systematic reviews (SRs) have investigated the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for migraine. Objective. To summarize and critically assess the quality of relevant SRs and present an objective and comprehensive evidence on the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for migraine. Data Sources. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medicine (CBM), China Science and Technology Journal (SCTJ), and WanFang database (WF) were searched from inception to December 2019 and grey literatures were manually searched. Selection Criteria. SRs which meet the criteria were independently selected by 2 reviewers according to a predetermined protocol. Data Extraction. Characteristics of included SRs were independently extracted by 2 reviewers following a predefined data extraction form. Review Appraisal. The methodological quality, risk of bias, and reporting quality of included SRs were assessed, respectively, by a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2, the Risk of Bias in Systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool, and the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-Acupuncture (PRISMA-A) statement. The quality of outcomes was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results. A total of 15 SRs were included. All the SRs were published between 2011-2019. Based on AMSTAR 2, 14 out of 15 SRs were rated critically low quality and 1 was rated low quality. According to ROBIS tool, 9 SRs (60%) were low risk of bias. With the PRISMA-A checklist, we found 11 out of 15 SRs were found adequately reported over 70%. With the GRADE tool, we found high quality of evidence indicated that the effective rate of acupuncture was superior to western medicine in treatment of migraine. Besides, acupuncture reduced more headache days and the times of using painkiller and was more effective in reducing the frequency and degree of headache than western medicine and sham acupuncture. Limitations. There might be some missing information. The accuracy of the conclusions may be decreased reduced since we were unable to synthesis all the evidence. Conclusions. Based on high quality of evidence, we concluded that acupuncture may be an effective and safe therapy for migraine. However, the quality of SRs in acupuncture for migraine still needs more improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis An overview of systematic reviews
    Li, Juan
    Li, Yu-Xi
    Luo, Liao-Jun
    Ye, Jing
    Zhong, Dong-Ling
    Xiao, Qi-Wei
    Zheng, Hui
    Geng, Chun-Mei
    Jin, Rong-Jiang
    Liang, Fan-Rong
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (28)
  • [2] Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews
    Qi, Wen-Chuan
    Fu, Hong-Juan
    Sun, Rui-Rui
    Li, Xiang
    Cai, Ding-Jun
    Wang, Chao
    Liang, Fan-Rong
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [3] Acupuncture for the Treatment of Migraine: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Wenhui Guo
    Hai Cui
    Lu Zhang
    Ruosang Du
    Hongwen Yuan
    Shumei Zheng
    [J]. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2023, 27 : 239 - 257
  • [4] Acupuncture for the Treatment of Migraine: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Guo, Wenhui
    Cui, Hai
    Zhang, Lu
    Du, Ruosang
    Yuan, Hongwen
    Zheng, Shumei
    [J]. CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2023, 27 (08) : 239 - 257
  • [5] Safety of Acupuncture: Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Chan, Malcolm W. C.
    Wu, Xin Yin
    Wu, Justin C. Y.
    Wong, Samuel Y. S.
    Chung, Vincent C. H.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [6] Safety of Acupuncture: Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Malcolm W. C. Chan
    Xin Yin Wu
    Justin C. Y. Wu
    Samuel Y. S. Wong
    Vincent C. H. Chung
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [7] Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for treating functional constipation: An overview of systematic reviews
    Jun-peng Yao
    Li-ping Chen
    Xian-jun Xiao
    Ting-hui Hou
    Si-yuan Zhou
    Ming-min Xu
    Kai Wang
    Yu-jun Hou
    Lin Zhang
    Ying Li
    [J]. Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2022, 20 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [8] Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for treating functional constipation: An overview of systematic reviews
    Yao, Jun-peng
    Chen, Li-ping
    Xiao, Xian-jun
    Hou, Ting-hui
    Zhou, Si-yuan
    Xu, Ming-min
    Wang, Kai
    Hou, Yu-jun
    Zhang, Lin
    Li, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE-JIM, 2022, 20 (01): : 13 - 25
  • [9] Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for children with cerebral palsy: An overview of systematic reviews
    Hu, Jinglin
    Wang, Xichen
    Liu, Xinyu
    Xia, Tingting
    Liu, Qi
    Zhang, Xudong
    Hu, Yinghua
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 56
  • [10] Comparison of Acupuncture and Sham Acupuncture in Migraine Treatment An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Li, Mao
    Wang, Weijun
    Gao, Wen
    Yang, Dongdong
    [J]. NEUROLOGIST, 2022, 27 (03) : 111 - 118