En bloc re-resection of high-risk NMIBC after en bloc resection: results of a multicenter observational study

被引:29
|
作者
Hurle, Rodolfo [1 ]
Casale, Paolo [1 ]
Lazzeri, Massimo [1 ]
Paciotti, Marco [1 ]
Saita, Alberto [1 ]
Colombo, Piergiuseppe [2 ]
Morenghi, Emanuela [3 ]
Oswald, David [4 ]
Colleselli, Daniela [4 ]
Mitterberger, Michael [4 ]
Kunit, Thomas [4 ]
Hager, Martina [5 ]
Herrmann, Thomas R. W. [6 ]
Lusuardi, Lukas [4 ]
机构
[1] Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Clin & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Via Manzoni 56, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[2] Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Dept Pathol, Clin & Res Hosp, Via Manzoni 56, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, I-20090 Milan, Italy
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Urol, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Salzburg, Austria
[6] Spital Thurgau AG, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Dept Urol, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
关键词
Bladder cancer; NMIBC; En bloc resection; En bloc re-resection; Outcome; INVASIVE BLADDER-CANCER; REPEAT TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; PROGRESSION RATES; RECURRENCE; IRRIGATION; CARCINOMA; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-019-02805-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the role of en bloc re-resection (EBRS) in patients who had undergone previous en bloc resection for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Methods An international, multicenter, observational retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients with a high-risk NMIBC who had previously undergone en bloc resection were scheduled for EBRS of the resected area after 40 days. The primary outcome was the presence of residual tumor or recurrence-free survival. Results Overall, 78 patients underwent EBRS. Only five (6.41%) residual cancers were found: one patient had a pTa G3 (1.28%) cancer and four (5.13%) had a pTis. The detrusor muscle was preserved in all samples. Only one patient had a positive margin on EBRS. No procedure called for a conversion to traditional re-TURBT. No patient experienced bladder perforation or other intra-operative complications. The recurrence rate at the first follow-up cystoscopy (RRFF-C at 3 months) was 3.85% (three patients). The median follow-up period was 30.8 months (range 6.9-76.0 months). In univariate analysis, the only predictor of recurrence was grade. Overall we observed 11 recurrences. Only one tumor progressed to T2 MIBC. Conclusions The low rates of residual tumor, recurrence, and progression seem to raise doubts about the efficacy of EBRS in patients who have previously undergone en bloc resection. EBRS appears to be a feasible and safe procedure with a low rate of complications. However, further data will be needed before EBRS can be used in clinical trials or recommended as a treatment modality.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 708
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] En bloc re-resection of high-risk NMIBC after en bloc resection: results of a multicenter observational study
    Rodolfo Hurle
    Paolo Casale
    Massimo Lazzeri
    Marco Paciotti
    Alberto Saita
    Piergiuseppe Colombo
    Emanuela Morenghi
    David Oswald
    Daniela Colleselli
    Michael Mitterberger
    Thomas Kunit
    Martina Hager
    Thomas R. W. Herrmann
    Lukas Lusuardi
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 703 - 708
  • [2] Comparison of En Bloc Resection and Intralesional Excision for Re-resection of Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine
    Zhou, Hua
    Tang, Yanchao
    Hu, Panpan
    Zhai, Shuheng
    Liu, Xiaoguang
    Liu, Zhongjun
    Wei, Feng
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (03) : 613 - 619
  • [3] Lung hernia after en bloc cervicothoracic resection
    Gupta, M
    Cohen, J
    Sukumar, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 130 (02): : 607 - 608
  • [4] Hilar cholangiocarcinoma - results of en bloc resection of tumor and liver
    Otto, G
    Thies, J
    Hoppe-Lotichius, M
    Bittinger, F
    Pitton, MB
    Hadian, A
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2004, 75 (01): : 59 - 65
  • [5] Is en bloc resection essential for endoscopic resection of GI neoplasia?
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Kaltenbach, Tonya
    Soetikno, Roy
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (06) : 805 - 807
  • [6] Laser versus electrical en bloc resection of bladder tumors: Results of a European multicenter study (EBRUC).
    Kramer, Mario W.
    Martov, Alexey
    Baykov, Nikolay
    Klein, Jan
    Rassweiler, Jens J.
    Lusuardi, Lukas
    Janetschek, Guenter
    Hurle, Rodolfo
    Wolters, Mathias
    Abbas, Mahmoud
    Leitenberger, Armin
    Riedl, Markus
    Nagele, Udo
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Kuczyk, Markus A.
    Babjuk, Marek
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
  • [7] LOCAL EN BLOC RESECTION FOR LIMB PRESERVATION
    JAFFE, N
    WATTS, H
    FELLOWS, KE
    VAWTER, G
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REPORTS, 1978, 62 (02): : 217 - 223
  • [8] Transurethral en bloc resection of bladder tumors
    Saito, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06): : 2148 - 2150
  • [9] RADICAL EN BLOC RESECTION OF THE TEMPORAL BONE
    ARIYAN, S
    SASAKI, CT
    SPENCER, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 142 (04): : 443 - 447
  • [10] Transurethral en bloc resection of bladder tumours
    Fallahi, M
    Ubrig, B
    Roth, S
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2005, 36 (01) : 31 - 32