Posterior capsule opacification and lens epithelial cell layer formation: Hydroview hydrogel versus AcrySof acrylic intraocular lenses

被引:40
|
作者
Scaramuzza, A
Fernando, GT
Crayford, BB
机构
[1] Orange Base Hosp, Orange, NSW, Australia
[2] Dudley Private Hosp, Orange, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00829-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To quantitatively compare the incidence of visually significant posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and lens epithelial cell (LEC) layer formation on the anterior surface of Hydroview (R) hydrogel and AcrySof (R) acrylic foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) after implantation. Setting. Single-surgeon ophthalmology practice, Orange Base Hospital, and Dudley Private Hospital, Orange, New South Wales, Australia. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 166 eyes of 150 patients (after exclusions) who had cataract extraction and insertion of a foldable IOL in the capsular bag by a single surgeon using a standardized phacoemulsification technique from December 1997 to September 1998. The mean follow-up was 13.1 months (range 6.0 to 23.6 months). The eyes were divided into 2 groups based on the type of IOL implanted: Storz Hydroview H60M (81 eyes) or Alcon AcrySof MA30BA (85 eyes). A neodymium:YAG posterior capsule laser capsulotomy (PC YAG) was performed for an objective decrease in Snellen best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of more than 1 line, significant visual symptoms, or both. This was used as a measure of visually significant PCO. An Nd:YAG anterior surface clearance (ASC YAG) was done for LEC layer formation anterior to the IOL to better visualize or facilitate treatment of PCO. The rates of PC YAG and ASC YAG after Hydroview and AcrySof IOL implantation were statistically compared. Results: Forty-five eyes (55.6%) in the Hydroview IOL group and 3 eyes (3.5%) in the AcrySof IOL group required a PC YAG; the risk difference was 52.0% (P < .001), An ASC YAG was required in 27 eyes (33.3%) in the Hydroview group and 1 eye (1.2%) in the AcrySof group; the risk difference was 32.2% (P < .001). Survival analysis demonstrated that the only independent predictor of the incidence of PC YAG and ASC YAG over time was IOL type, with the Hydroview IOL group having a statistically significantly higher incidence of both procedures. Conclusion: There was a greater incidence of visually significant PCO and LEC layer formation on the anterior surface of Hydroview IOLs than of AcrySof IOLs.
引用
收藏
页码:1047 / 1054
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Relationship of AcrySof acrylic and PhacoFlex silicone intraocular lenses to visual acuity and posterior capsule opacification
    Halpern, MT
    Covert, D
    Battista, C
    Weinstein, AJ
    Levinson, RD
    Yan, L
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (04): : 662 - 669
  • [3] Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses
    Missier, KAA
    Nuijts, RMMA
    Tjia, KF
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (08): : 1569 - 1574
  • [4] Effect of AcrySof versus silicone or polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification
    Li, Ni
    Chen, Xiaoming
    Zhang, Junjun
    Zhou, Yong
    Yao, Xun
    Du, Liang
    Wei, Maoling
    Liu, Yi
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (05) : 830 - 838
  • [5] Posterior capsule opacification in children with "Acrysof" intraocular lens implantation.
    Liu, Y
    Zwaan, J
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S486 - S486
  • [6] Posterior capsule opacification with Hydroview H60M foldable intraocular lenses
    Titiyal, JS
    Sinha, R
    Dhingra, P
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (10): : 2242 - 2243
  • [7] Posterior capsule opacification and neodymium: YAG capsulotomy rates with AcrySof acrylic and PhacoFlex II silicone intraocular lenses
    Ernest, PH
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (08): : 1546 - 1550
  • [8] Analysis of cytoskeletal proteins in posterior capsule opacification after implantation of acrylic and hydrogel intraocular lenses
    Matsushima, H
    Mukai, K
    Obara, Y
    Yoshida, S
    Clark, JI
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (01): : 187 - 194
  • [9] Comparison of posterior capsule opacification with hydrophobic acrylic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses
    Vasavada, Abhay R.
    Raj, Shetal M.
    Shah, Alpesh
    Shah, Gauri
    Vasavada, Viraj
    Vasavada, Vaishali
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (06): : 1050 - 1059
  • [10] Lens epithelial cell layer formation related to hydrogel foldable intraocular lenses
    Koch, MU
    Kalicharan, D
    van der Want, JJL
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 25 (12): : 1637 - 1640