The carbon footprint of meat and dairy proteins: A practical perspective to guide low carbon footprint dietary choices

被引:32
|
作者
Gaillac, R. [1 ]
Marbach, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Courant Inst Math Sci, 251 Mercer St, New York, NY 10012 USA
关键词
Food practices; Food behavior; Systematic literature review; Sustainable consumption; Sustainable diets; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BEEF-PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; PROSTATE-CANCER RISK; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; GROWTH-FACTORS; CHEESE PRODUCTION; FOOD-MILES; HEALTH; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128766
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Meat and dairy products in the food industry represent a significant portion of anthropogenic green house gas emissions. To meet the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommendations to limit global warming, these emissions should be reduced. Meat and dairy products are also responsible for the majority of our daily, vital, protein intake. Yet, meat and dairy products contain very different amounts of proteins, making it difficult in general to rationalize which protein source has the lowest carbon footprint. Here we present a practical and pedagogical review, comparing the carbon footprint of a variety of meat and dairy products with respect to their protein content. We investigate the carbon footprint of different dietary choices for several countries, by keeping the total number of meat and dairy proteins constant. Interestingly, we find that dairy-only diets are in general only a little less carbon intensive than current diets. However, 50% carbon footprint reduction may be obtained, throughout the world, with a "low CO2''-tailored diet including only small poultry, eggs and yogurt. Such a dietary pattern suggests easy to follow consumer guidelines for reduced carbon footprint. We report further on a number of consumer-oriented questions (local or imported? organic or not? cow or goat milk? hard or soft cheese?). Our methodology may be applied to broader questions, such as the carbon footprint of proteins in general (including fish and plant proteins). We hope our work will drive more studies focusing on consumer-oriented questions.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy and carbon footprint: numbers matter in low energy and low carbon choices
    Chakraborty, Debrupa
    Roy, Joyashree
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (02) : 237 - 243
  • [2] Carbon footprint and nutritional quality of different human dietary choices
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Esteve-Llorens, Xavier
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 644 : 77 - 94
  • [3] CARBON FOOTPRINT AND THE DAIRY INDUSTRY
    Chase, L. E.
    [J]. 2014 CORNELL NUTRITION CONFERENCE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS, PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 148 - 154
  • [4] A practical guide to scope 1 & 2 carbon footprint reduction
    Johnson, Cary
    Fildes, Jimmy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 2022, 99 : 12 - 12
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions of realistic dietary choices in Denmark: the carbon footprint and nutritional value of dairy products
    Werner, Louise Bruun
    Flysjo, Anna
    Tholstrup, Tine
    [J]. FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2014, 58
  • [6] Dairy's Carbon Footprint and Sustainability
    Mitloehner, Frank M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, VOL 24, 2012, 24 : 347 - 350
  • [7] Carbon footprint in Latin American dairy systems
    Velarde-Guillen, Jose
    Arndt, Claudia
    Gomez, Carlos A.
    [J]. TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2022, 54 (01)
  • [8] Role of dairy in the carbon footprint of US beef
    Tichenor, Nicole
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (08) : E820 - E821
  • [9] Estimation of the Carbon Footprint in Dairy Sheep Farm
    Ceyhan, A.
    Akyol, E.
    Unalan, A.
    Cinar, S.
    Ali, W.
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 10 (04): : 639 - 645
  • [10] Carbon footprint in Latin American dairy systems
    José Velarde-Guillén
    Claudia Arndt
    Carlos A. Gómez
    [J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54