Wildlife trade

被引:29
|
作者
Hughes, Alice C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Xishuangbanna 666303, Yunnan, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.056
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Global trade of wildlife is a major driver of species decline. The trade in wildlife actually plays a much larger role in our daily lives than many people realize, and its use and legality are surprisingly complex. Wildlife trade includes the trade of any organism, including fungi, plants and animals, sourced from the wild. This comprises thousands of wild species, including over 7600, or nearly one quarter, of terrestrial vertebrate species. Trade in wildlife is worth billions annually via commercial fishing at $180 billion, timber at $227 billion and fashion at $2.5 billion — in addition to largely unquantified trade for meat, medicine, ornamental use and pets. Wildlife trade, such as that of ivory, is the subject of intense public debate, international regulation and criminal prosecution, while trade of other species is more often overlooked. How wildlife trade is regulated and what is legal and illegal varies both between and within taxonomic groups and depends on where and how trade occurs. Wildlife trade across most sectors has increased since monitoring began, for example, between 1996 and 2018 the global fish market rose from $40 billion to $180 billion, wood from $65 billion to $137 billion and reptile leather for fashion trade from $140 million to $600 million. In concert, the annual number of trades legally traded through CITES has also grown, from under 5000 transactions in 1977 to peaking at over 1.3 million in 2015, with shipment size increasing in parallel and seizures of illegally traded species showing similar trends. Balancing the needs of people for livelihood generation, especially with access and benefit-sharing rights, with the impact on species survival remains difficult. Issues like the role of trophy and sports hunting within conservation remain a topic of debate in the conservation community. Finding approaches that enable long-term species survival, are equitable and do not undermine livelihoods is a constant challenge. © 2021 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:R1218 / R1224
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FREE-TRADE AND WILDLIFE TRADE
    ROSE, DA
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1992, 6 (01) : 148 - &
  • [2] The gravity of wildlife trade
    Symes, William S.
    McGrath, Francesca L.
    Rao, Madhu
    Carrasco, L. Roman
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 218 : 268 - 276
  • [3] Data on wildlife trade
    Blundell, AG
    Mascia, MB
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) : 598 - 599
  • [4] Hunting, Wildlife Trade and Wildlife Consumption Patterns in Asia
    Bennett, Elizabeth L.
    [J]. BUSHMEAT AND LIVELIHOODS: WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AND POVERTY REDUCTION, 2007, 2 : 241 - 249
  • [5] Reducing the Risks of the Wildlife Trade
    Smith, Katherine F.
    Behrens, Michael
    Schloegel, Lisa M.
    Marano, Nina
    Burgiel, Stas
    Daszak, Peter
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5927) : 594 - 595
  • [6] Redesigning the Wildlife Trade System
    Pernetta, Angelo P.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5933) : 1389 - 1389
  • [7] Battling the illegal wildlife trade
    Alexander, Kathleen A.
    Sanderson, Claire E.
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 1 (04):
  • [8] Wildlife trade: ban orientalism
    Pagani-Nunez, Emilio
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 579 (7800) : 497 - 497
  • [9] Battling the illegal wildlife trade
    Kathleen A. Alexander
    Claire E. Sanderson
    [J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1
  • [10] Effects of wildlife trade mapped
    不详
    [J]. NATURE, 2017, 541 (7636) : 137 - 137