What is the health cost of haze pollution? Evidence from China

被引:23
|
作者
Hao, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhao, Mingyuan [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Zhi-Nan [6 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Elect Vehicles Beijing, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Sustainable Dev Res Inst Econ & Soc Beijing, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, Thrombosis & Vasc Med Ctr, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
haze pollution; residents' health; health cost; VOSL; panel data model; AIR-POLLUTION; DAILY MORTALITY; PM2.5; POLLUTION; PUBLIC-HEALTH; LUNG-CANCER; IMPACTS; EXPOSURE; SYSTEM; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/hpm.2791
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Haze pollution has become a serious threat to the health of residents and has brought about considerable economic costs. The objectives of this study are to examine the relationship between haze pollution and residents' health and to estimate the health cost of haze pollution. Methods: Using macro data on 74 major Chinese cities, this study employs a static panel data model and a dynamic panel generalized method of moments model to investigate the impact of haze pollution on the mortality of residents. On the basis of the estimation results, the value of a statistical life (VOSL) method is used to evaluate the economic cost of haze pollution on residents' health. Results: In 74 major cities of China, an increase in concentration of PM2.5 pollutants by 1 mu g/m(3) may cause the mortality rate to rise by 25 per million people. The VOSL of haze pollution in China is about 1.53 million yuan. The health cost of residents from haze in 74 major cities of China in 2016 was about 888 billion yuan, equivalent to about 2% of the these cities' GDP. Conclusions: Haze pollution has serious damage to the health of urban residents and therefore brings about considerable economic losses.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1303
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polycentric agglomeration and haze pollution: evidence from China
    Wu, Kexin
    Chen, Xu
    Anwar, Sajid
    Alexander, William Robert J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (13) : 35646 - 35662
  • [2] Polycentric agglomeration and haze pollution: evidence from China
    Kexin Wu
    Xu Chen
    Sajid Anwar
    William Robert J. Alexander
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 35646 - 35662
  • [3] Industrial agglomeration and haze pollution: Evidence from China
    Chen, Yufeng
    Zhu, Zhitao
    Cheng, Siyuan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 845
  • [4] Trade liberalization and haze pollution: Evidence from China
    Xu, Yingzhi
    Fan, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Zhiqian
    Zhang, Ruijie
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 109
  • [5] Haze, air pollution, and health in China
    Xu, Peng
    Chen, Yongfen
    Ye, Xiaojian
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 382 (9910): : 2067 - 2067
  • [6] The effects of haze pollution on stock performances: evidence from China
    Zhang, Yihao
    Jiang, Yu
    Guo, Yongji
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (23) : 2226 - 2237
  • [7] Digital economy development and haze pollution: evidence from China
    Shuai Che
    Jun Wang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 73210 - 73226
  • [8] Factors Contributing to Haze Pollution: Evidence from Macao, China
    To, Wai-Ming
    Lee, Peter K. C.
    Ng, Chi To
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (09):
  • [9] Digital economy development and haze pollution: evidence from China
    Che, Shuai
    Wang, Jun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (48) : 73210 - 73226
  • [10] Corruption, market segmentation and haze pollution: empirical evidence from China
    Zhao, Junfeng
    Shen, Jianliang
    Yan, Jinling
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Hao, Yu
    Ran, Qiying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 66 (03) : 642 - 664