A COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE SCORES OF FIVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF COMPOSITE RESINS

被引：2

作者：

Dalli, M. ^{[1
]}

Bahsi, E. ^{[1
]}

Sahbaz, C. ^{[1
]}

Ince, B. ^{[1
]}

Akkus, Z. ^{[2
]}

Ercan, E. ^{[3
]}

Atilgan, S. S. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Dicle Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Operat Dent, Diyarbakir, Turkey

[2] Dicle Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Diyarbakir, Turkey

[3] Kirikkale Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Operat Dent, Diyarbakir, Turkey

[4] Dicle Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Diyarbakir, Turkey

来源：

BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT | 2010年 / 24卷 / 04期

关键词：

microleakage; different composite resins; self-etching adhesive systems; methylene blue; cervical lesion; ENAMEL BOND STRENGTH; CLASS-V RESTORATIONS; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; IN-ONE ADHESIVE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION; CERVICAL LESIONS; DENTIN ADHESIVE; SYSTEMS; PERMEABILITY; ABILITY;

D O I：

10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9

中图分类号：

Q81 [生物工程学（生物技术）]; Q93 [微生物学];

学科分类号：

071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;

摘要：

This study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of microleakage in Class V cavities among five different composite resins For this purpose 100 fresh caries-free human permanent molars were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n=20) Clearfil Majesty Esthetic + Clearfil S3 Bond (Group I) TPH Spectrum + Xeno V (Group II) Gradia Direct Anterior + G Bond (GC) (Group III) Premise + Optibond All in One (Group IV) and Charisma + iBond (Group V) were applied and polymerized under LED Specimens were varnished immersed in 0 5% methylene and sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually and microleakage scores were determined Gingival and occlusal microleakage scores among groups were statistically significant (p < 0 05) (p=0 043 p=0 005) Occlusal microleakage scores for Clearfil Majesty Esthetic and Premise were lower than in the other groups Charisma had the highest microleakage scores with no difference among the other groups (p > 0 05) In conclusion occlusal and gingival microleakage scores were satisfactory except for Charisma

引用

页码：2122 / 2126

页数：5

共 50 条

[1] Microleakage of different resin composite types
Yazici, AR
Çelik, Ç
Ozgünaltay, G
[J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 35 (10): : 790 - 794
[2] Comparison of a Nanofiber-Reinforced Composite with Different Types of Composite Resins
Ozduman, Zuemruet Ceren
Oglakci, Burcu
Bagis, Derya Merve Halacoglu
Temel, Binnur Aydogan
Dalkilic, Evrim Eliguzeloglu
[J]. POLYMERS, 2023, 15 (17)
[3] Microleakage of three different combinations of adhesive and composite resins
Cagidiaco, E. Ferrari
Karafili, D.
Verniani, G.
Zucca, G.
Ferrari, M.
[J]. JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2021, 13 (03) : 115 - 120
[4] Microleakage in deciduous teeth restored with different composite resins.
Medeiros, AS
Borsatto, MC
Corona, SAM
Dibb, RGP
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1038 - 1038
[5] Microleakage of packable composite resins
Meiers, JC
Kazemi, R
Meier, CD
[J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2001, 26 (02) : 121 - 126
[6] Effects of different light sources on microleakage of composite resins with different monomer structures
Yilmaz, Fikret
Gonulol, Nihan
Guler, Eda
Ersoz, Engin
Aytac, Fatma
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 9 (04) : 364 - 370
[7] MICROLEAKAGE OF SELECTED COMPOSITE RESTORATIVE RESINS
RETIEF, DH
WOODS, E
JAMISON, HC
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1982, 10 (04) : 292 - 299
[8] The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of class V cavities
Yazici, AR
Özgünaltay, G
Dayangaç, B
[J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2003, 28 (06) : 773 - 778
[9] The effects of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici, A. R.
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B35 - B35
[10] MICROLEAKAGE OF POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS - AN ELECTROCHEMICAL STUDY
WORKMAN, WJ
VONFRAUNHOFER, JA
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1990, 69 : 129 - 129

← 1 2 3 4 5 →