Lab and pilot scale tests as tools for upgrading - Comparison with full scale results

被引:6
|
作者
Malmqvist, A [1 ]
Gunnarsson, L
Torstenon, C
机构
[1] ANOX AB, S-22370 Lund, Sweden
[2] ANOX Biosyst AB, S-22370 Lund, Sweden
[3] Metsa Serla AB, S-57016 Kvillsfors, Sweden
关键词
biological treatment; lab scale tests; pilot scale tests; pulp and paper industry effluents; suspended-carrier biofilm processes;
D O I
10.2166/wst.1998.0336
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Parameters such as hydraulic retention time, organic load, maximum COD removal, sludge characteristics and optimal nutrient dosage can be determined by simulation in small scale models of the chosen process. Laboratory tests are the natural first step when considering upgrading, or designing a new, biological treatment plant. The potential for a biological treatment can be examined at a low cost and within a minimum of time, often through parallel testing of different treatment methods. Once a suitable process configuration has been found, lab scale tests may well be used for optimizing the process and obtaining design data, thus minimizing the need for more expensive tests in larger scale. The principal reason for a pilot plant test is the possibility to investigate natural variations in wastewater composition and the effect this will have on process stability. The use of laboratory and pilot scale tests is here illustrated by the work carried out prior to the upgrading of the treatment plant at Nyboholm paper mill. A description of the upgraded full scale installation consisting of both chemical treatment and a suspended-carrier biofilm process is included and a comparison between results from lab, pilot and full scale treatment is made. (C) 1998 IAWQ. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the blast fragmentation from lab-scale and full-scale tests at Bararp
    Moser, P
    Grasedieck, A
    Olsson, M
    Ouchterlony, E
    EXPLOSIVES AND BLASTING TECHNIQUE, 2003, : 449 - 458
  • [2] LOW-GRADE BIOMASS UPGRADING BY WASHING AND TORREFACTION: LAB AND PILOT-SCALE RESULTS
    Abelha, P.
    Janssen, A.
    Vilela, C. Mourao
    Nanou, P.
    Carbo, M.
    PAPERS OF THE 26TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2018, : 1209 - 1220
  • [3] Comparison of ultraviolet pilot trial results with full-scale operation
    Hartz, K
    Griffith, J
    WATER-ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2001, 148 (01): : 37 - 40
  • [4] Comparison of MEA degradation in pilot-scale with lab-scale experiments
    Lepaumier, Helene
    da Silva, Eirik F.
    Einbu, Aslak
    Grimstvedt, Andreas
    Knudsen, Jacob N.
    Zahlsen, Kolbjorn
    Svendsen, Hallvard F.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 1652 - 1659
  • [5] DESIGN OF PIPELINE COMPOSITE REPAIRS: FROM LAB SCALE TESTS TO FEA AND FULL SCALE TESTING
    Her, Remy
    Renard, Jacques
    Gaffard, Vincent
    Favry, Yves
    Wiet, Paul
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 2, 2014,
  • [6] Upgrading of Palm Oil Empty Fruit Bunch Employing Hydrothermal Treatment in Lab-scale and Pilot Scale
    Novianti, Srikandi
    Biddinika, M. K.
    Prawisudha, Pandji
    Yoshikawa, Kunio
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR HUMAN SECURITY SUSTAIN 2013, 2014, 20 : 46 - 54
  • [7] Use of full scale results for selecting prediction tools
    Lepeix, R.
    Proceedings of MARIN Workshops on: Advanced Vessels, Station Keeping, Propulsor-Hull Interaction, and Nautical Simulators, 1992,
  • [8] The challenge of bringing bleaching results from lab to full scale
    Albertsson, S
    Roring, A
    1997 RECYCLING SYMPOSIUM, 1997, : 261 - 266
  • [9] Full-scale tests help improve reliability of DST tools
    Ringgenberg, P
    Self, JC
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1996, 94 (32) : 46 - 51
  • [10] Voltage Withstand Tests on a Full Scale Overhead Line Tower Model for Line Upgrading
    Hinteregger, Michael
    Judendorfer, Thomas
    Muhr, Michael
    Berlijn, Sonja
    Olsen, Anders
    2011 ELECTRICAL INSULATION CONFERENCE (EIC), 2011, : 368 - 372