Exploring the co-benefits (and costs) of home gardening for biodiversity conservation

被引:41
|
作者
Raymond, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Diduck, Alan P. [3 ]
Buijs, Arjen [4 ]
Boerchers, Morrissa [3 ]
Moquin, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci HELSUS, POB 65, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry Sci, POB 65, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Winnipeg, Dept Environm Studies & Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] Wageningen Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Forest & Nat Conservat Policy, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Ecosystem services; well-being; sense of place; place attachment; restoration; nature; URBAN GREEN SPACE; VEGETABLE INTAKE; FOOD SECURITY; COMMUNITY; HEALTH; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; KNOWLEDGE; PRIVATE;
D O I
10.1080/13549839.2018.1561657
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite growing evidence pointing to the multiple benefits of home gardening, few studies have considered the health and well-being benefits perceived by gardeners who are principally motivated by biodiversity conservation (i.e. home gardening for biodiversity conservation). This study explores the environmental, social and economic co-benefits (and costs) of home gardening for biodiversity conservation in the City of Winnipeg, Canada. A total of 42 semi-structured interviews (30-60min each) were conducted with 50 home gardeners who were formally certified or locally recognised for undertaking multiple gardening activities that promote biodiversity conservation. Thematic analysis revealed that study participants self-reported a range of environmental, psychological, physiological and social outcomes associated with their home gardening experiences. Despite home gardening often being a solitary activity, most gardeners valued the multiple forms of social interaction that occurred during important social events in their garden, or when connecting with passers-by. Home gardeners also cited benefits related to connection to nature and place attachment; attention restoration; reduced stress and anxiety; improved mood; satisfaction and pride; increased self-esteem and courage to do things differently in life; and, important education or learning opportunities. However, conflicts relating to the nexus between biodiversity and perceived tidiness of gardens emerged, which raise important ethical and social justice issues for sustainability planning. We compare key insights to the benefits (and costs) of community gardening and make some recommendations for future research, including how to engage more disadvantaged groups in gardening for conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 273
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The co-benefits of biodiversity conservation programmes on wider ecosystem services
    Austin, Zoe
    McVittie, Alistair
    McCracken, Davy
    Moxey, Andrew
    Moran, Dominic
    White, Piran C. L.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 20 : 37 - 43
  • [2] Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
    Rahman, Md Mizanur
    Zimmer, Martin
    Ahmed, Imran
    Donato, Daniel
    Kanzaki, Mamoru
    Xu, Ming
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [3] Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
    Md Mizanur Rahman
    Martin Zimmer
    Imran Ahmed
    Daniel Donato
    Mamoru Kanzaki
    Ming Xu
    [J]. Nature Communications, 12
  • [4] Home Gardening for Tropical Biodiversity Conservation
    Webb, Edward L.
    Kabir, Md Enamul
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (06) : 1641 - 1644
  • [5] Co-Benefits of Sustainable Forest Management in Biodiversity Conservation and Carbon Sequestration
    Imai, Nobuo
    Samejima, Hiromitsu
    Langner, Andreas
    Ong, Robert C.
    Kita, Satoshi
    Titin, Jupiri
    Chung, Arthur Y. C.
    Lagan, Peter
    Lee, Ying Fah
    Kitayama, Kanehiro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (12):
  • [6] Ecosystem Services in Conservation Planning: Targeted Benefits vs. Co-Benefits or Costs?
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Hoshizaki, Lara
    Klinkenberg, Brian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09):
  • [7] Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action
    Soto-Navarro, C.
    Ravilious, C.
    Arnell, A.
    de Lamo, X.
    Harfoot, M.
    Hill, S. L. L.
    Wearn, O. R.
    Santoro, M.
    Bouvet, A.
    Mermoz, S.
    Le Toan, T.
    Xia, J.
    Liu, S.
    Yuan, W.
    Spawn, S. A.
    Gibbs, H. K.
    Ferrier, S.
    Harwood, T.
    Alkemade, R.
    Schipper, A. M.
    Schmidt-Traub, G.
    Strassburg, B.
    Miles, L.
    Burgess, N. D.
    Kapos, V
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 375 (1794)
  • [8] Sharing and expanding the co-benefits of conservation
    Molina, Renato
    Costello, Christopher
    Kaffine, Daniel
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 218
  • [9] Climate co-benefits of tiger conservation
    Lamba, Aakash
    Teo, Hoong Chen
    Sreekar, Rachakonda
    Zeng, Yiwen
    Carrasco, Luis Roman
    Koh, Lian Pin
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 7 (07) : 1104 - +
  • [10] Climate co-benefits of tiger conservation
    Aakash Lamba
    Hoong Chen Teo
    Rachakonda Sreekar
    Yiwen Zeng
    Luis Roman Carrasco
    Lian Pin Koh
    [J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 1104 - 1113