Long-acting insulin analogue detemir compared with NPH insulin in type 1 diabetes A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Szypowska, Agnieszka [1 ]
Golicki, Dominik [2 ]
Groele, Lidia [1 ]
Pankowska, Ewa [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Paediat, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Pharmacoecon, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Inst Mother & Child Hlth, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
basal-bolus therapy; detemir; fasting plasma glucose; HbA(1c); NPH insulin; BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN; NEUTRAL PROTAMINE HAGEDORN; IMPROVED GLYCEMIC CONTROL; BLOOD-GLUCOSE CONTROL; PHARMACOKINETIC PROFILE; NOCTURNAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; TERM EFFICACY; REDUCED RISK; STEADY-STATE; DOUBLE-BLIND;
D O I
10.20452/pamw.1065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although numerous studies showed an improvement in glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients treated with long-acting insulin analogue detemir compared with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, the beneficial effects of insulin detemir has not been confirmed by all investigators. Objectives The aim of the study was to compare the effect of treatment with detemir insulin vs. NPH insulin on metabolic control, hypoglycemic episodes, and body weight gain in patients with type 1 diabetes by means of a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Methods The following electronic databases were searched up to November 2010: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Additional references were obtained from the reviewed articles. Only randomized controlled trials of at least 12-week duration with basal-bolus regimen therapies using detemir insulin vs. NPH insulin were included. Results The analysis included 10 studies involving 3825 patients with type 1 diabetes. Combined data from all trials showed a statistically significant reduction in hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) (weighted mean difference: [WMD] -0.073, 95% CI -0.135 to -0.011, P = 0.021) in the detemir group compared with the NPH group. There was also a significant reduction of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (WMD -0.977 mmol/l, 95% CI -1.395 to -0.558, P <0.001), all-day hypoglycemic episodes (relative risk [RR] 0.978, 95% CI 0.961-0.996), severe hypoglycemic episodes (RR 0.665, 95% CI 0.547-0.810), nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes (RR 0.877, 95% CI 0.816-0.942), as well as smaller body weight gain (WMD -0.779 kg, 95% CI -0.992 to -0.567) in patients using detemir insulin compared with those using NPH insulin. Conclusions Basal-bolus treatment with insulin detemir, as compared with NPH insulin, provided a minor benefit in terms of the HbA(1c) value and significantly reduced FPG in type 1 diabetic patients. Treatment with detemir insulin was also superior to NPH insulin in reducing the risk of all-day, nocturnal, and severe hypoglycemic episodes, with the added benefit of reduced weight gain.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 246
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH human insulin in type 2 diabetes - A meta-analysis
    Monami, Matteo
    Marchionni, Niccolo
    Mannucci, Edoardo
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 81 (02) : 184 - 189
  • [2] Long-Acting Insulin Analogues for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bahia, Luciana R.
    Cramer, Helena
    Lassance, Marcio
    Santos, Braulio
    Tura, Bernardo
    [J]. DIABETES, 2013, 62 : A239 - A239
  • [3] COMPARATIVE COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF LONG-ACTING INSULIN ANALOGUE (INSULIN DETEMIR) AND NPH INSULIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETES AND THE BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF INSULIN ANALOGUE REIMBURSEMENT IN POLAND
    Walczak, J.
    Pawlik, D.
    Jasinska, A.
    Garbacka, M.
    Kedzior, J.
    Fundament, T.
    Malczak, I
    Dardzinski, W.
    Skrzekowska-Baran, I
    Czech, M.
    Nogas, G.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A500 - A500
  • [4] Intermediate and long-acting insulins: a review of NPH insulin, insulin glargine and insulin detemir
    Peterson, Gregory E.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (12) : 2613 - 2619
  • [5] Long-acting insulin analogues vs. NPH human insulin in type 1 diabetes. A meta-analysis
    Monami, M.
    Marchionni, N.
    Mannucci, E.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2009, 11 (04): : 372 - 378
  • [7] Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes
    Robertson, K. J.
    Schoenle, E.
    Gucev, Z.
    Mordhorst, L.
    Gall, M. -A.
    Ludvigsson, J.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2007, 24 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [8] Insulin glargine: A systematic review of a long-acting insulin analogue
    Wang, F
    Carabino, JM
    Vergara, CM
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (06) : 1541 - 1577
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of insulin detemir vs. insulin NPH in pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatima, Kaneez
    Siddiqi, Ahmed K.
    Shakil, Saad
    Akhtar, Sareema E.
    Quraishy, Maryam S.
    Siddiqui, Khadija
    Rafique, Esha
    Maniya, Muhammad T.
    [J]. MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023,
  • [10] Treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Insulin Detemir, a Long-Acting Insulin Analog
    Young, Jason R.
    McAdam-Marx, Carrie
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND DIABETES, 2010, 3 : 65 - 80