Reviewing and assessing existing meta-analysis models and tools

被引:5
|
作者
Makinde, Funmilayo L. [2 ]
Tchamga, Milaine S. S. [3 ]
Jafali, James [4 ]
Fatumo, Segun [5 ]
Chimusa, Emile R. [1 ]
Mulder, Nicola [6 ]
Mazandu, Gaston K. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Pathol, Div Human Genet, Hlth Sci Campus Anzio Rd, ZA-7925 Observatory, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Computat Biol Div, African Inst Math Sci AIMS, Observatory, South Africa
[3] Univ Cape, Div Human Genet, African Inst Math Sci AIMS, Observatory, South Africa
[4] Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clin Res Programm, Pathogen Biol Res Grp, Blantyre, Malawi
[5] Univ London, London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[6] Univ Cape Town, Computat Biol Div, Observatory, South Africa
[7] African Inst Math Sci AIMS, Observatory, South Africa
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
meta-analysis; predictive power; sample size; data integration; cohort study; experimental study; DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENES; STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS; PACKAGE; MALARIA; PATHWAY;
D O I
10.1093/bib/bbab324
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Over the past few years, meta-analysis has become popular among biomedical researchers for detecting biomarkers across multiple cohort studies with increased predictive power. Combining datasets from different sources increases sample size, thus overcoming the issue related to limited sample size from each individual study and boosting the predictive power. This leads to an increased likelihood of more accurately predicting differentially expressed genes/proteins or significant biomarkers underlying the biological condition of interest. Currently, several meta-analysis methods and tools exist, each having its own strengths and limitations. In this paper, we survey existing meta-analysis methods, and assess the performance of different methods based on results from different datasets as well as assessment from prior knowledge of each method. This provides a reference summary of meta-analysis models and tools, which helps to guide end-users on the choice of appropriate models or tools for given types of datasets and enables developers to consider current advances when planning the development of new meta-analysis models and more practical integrative tools.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New and Existing Approaches Reviewing of Big Data Analysis with Hadoop Tools
    Mutasher, Watheq Ghanim
    Aljuboori, Abbas Fadhil
    BAGHDAD SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2022, 19 (04) : 887 - 898
  • [2] Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Park, Seong-Hi
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 30 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [3] Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seong-Hi Park
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2018, 30 : 1 - 16
  • [4] Reviewing change in the arable flora of Europe: a meta-analysis
    Richner, N.
    Holderegger, R.
    Linder, H. P.
    Walter, T.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2015, 55 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [5] Application of meta-analysis in reviewing occupational cohort studies
    Wong, O
    Raabe, GK
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1996, 53 (12) : 793 - 800
  • [6] REVIEWING THE LITERATURE - A COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL METHODS WITH META-ANALYSIS
    COOK, TD
    LEVITON, LC
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1980, 48 (04) : 449 - 472
  • [7] Meta-Analysis for Models
    Conn, Vicki S.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 37 (04) : 423 - 424
  • [8] Accuracy of Wristband Fitbit Models in Assessing Sleep: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Haghayegh, Shahab
    Khoshnevis, Sepideh
    Smolensky, Michael H.
    Diller, Kenneth R.
    Castriotta, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (11)
  • [9] Assessing the consistency of iPSC and animal models in cystic fibrosis modelling: A meta-analysis
    Darwish, Toqa
    Al-Khulaifi, Azhar
    Ali, Menatalla
    Mowafy, Rana
    Arredouani, Abdelilah
    Doi, Suhail A.
    Emara, Mohamed M.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [10] Assessing Study Quality in Meta-Analysis
    Feeley, Thomas Hugh
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (2-3) : 334 - 342