Integrated modeling of groundwater-surface water interactions in a tile-drained agricultural field: The importance of directly measured flow route contributions

被引:41
|
作者
Rozemeijer, J. C. [1 ,2 ]
van der Velde, Y. [2 ,3 ]
McLaren, R. G. [4 ]
van Geer, F. C. [1 ,5 ]
Broers, H. P. [2 ,5 ]
Bierkens, M. F. P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Phys Geog, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Deltares, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ, Soil Phys Ecohydrol & Groundwater Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Waterloo, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[5] Geol Survey Netherlands, TNO, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS; CATCHMENT; QUALITY; UNCERTAINTY; SEPARATION; HYDROLOGY; DISCHARGE; DYNAMICS; SOIL;
D O I
10.1029/2010WR009155
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the dynamics of groundwater-surface water interaction is needed to evaluate and simulate water and solute transport in catchments. However, direct measurements of the contributions of different flow routes from specific surfaces within a catchment toward the surface water are rarely available. For this study, we physically separated the tile drain discharge toward a 43.5 m ditch transect from the groundwater-plus-overland flow routes. Direct groundwater flow and ephemeral overland flow were jointly captured in three sheet pile in-stream reservoirs, while the effluent from three tile drain outlets was collected in vessels. Our flux measurements showed that, in response to a rainfall event, the tile drain contribution to the total ditch discharge decreased from 80% to 28%. We used these flow route measurements to calibrate a field-scale integrated water transport model. The HydroGeoSphere code was used because it simultaneously solves the flow regimes in the variably saturated domain, the tile drain domain, and the surface flow domain. This simultaneous solution is needed for a correct representation of the mutual interactions between groundwater flow, tile drain flow, and ditch water flow. Our model produced a flow distribution between the flow paths which deviated only 2% from the measured flow distribution. A sensitivity analysis showed that model parameters related to tile drain entrance resistance and to the resistance to water flow through the surface water system controlled the water flow route distribution but with little effect on groundwater levels. This indicates that a model calibration based on groundwater levels alone does not necessarily produce a correct representation of the flow route contributions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Simulating coupled surface and subsurface water flow in a tile-drained agricultural catchment
    De Schepper, Guillaume
    Therrien, Rene
    Refsgaard, Jens Christian
    Hansen, Anne Lausten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 521 : 374 - 388
  • [2] Groundwater seepage causes surface runoff and erosion during snowmelt in a tile-drained agricultural catchment: Field observations and modelling analysis
    Stuurop, Joris C.
    van der Zee, Sjoerd E. A. T. M.
    Thiis, Thomas K.
    French, Helen K.
    [J]. CATENA, 2023, 220
  • [3] Three Two-Dimensional Approaches for Simulating the Water Flow Dynamics in a Heterogeneous Tile-Drained Agricultural Field in Denmark
    Varvaris, Ioannis
    Borgesen, Christen Duus
    Kjaergaard, Charlotte
    Iversen, Bo V.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (06) : 1367 - 1383
  • [4] Direct measurements of the tile drain and groundwater flow route contributions to surface water contamination: From field-scale concentration patterns in groundwater to catchment-scale surface water quality
    Rozemeijer, J. C.
    van der Velde, Y.
    van Geer, F. C.
    Bierkens, M. F. P.
    Broers, H. P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2010, 158 (12) : 3571 - 3579
  • [5] Modeling the spatio-temporal flow dynamics of groundwater-surface water interactions of the Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile, Ethiopia
    Tigabu, Tibebe B.
    Wagner, Paul D.
    Hoermann, Georg
    Fohrer, Nicola
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 51 (06): : 1537 - 1559