Potassium fertilization effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and reniform nematode populations

被引:57
|
作者
Pettigrew, WT [1 ]
Meredith, WR [1 ]
Young, LD [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Crop Genet & Prod Res Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2004.0321
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lint yields have not changed appreciably during the last decade. Because more and higher infestations of reniform nematodes (Rotylenchulus reniformis) have been identified in mid-southern USA fields, this nematode might be a mitigating factor in the cotton yield stagnation. The objectives were to determine how varying rates of K fertilization interacted with different cotton genotypes to influence dry matter partitioning, lint yield, fiber quality, and reniform nematode populations. Nine cotton genotypes were grown in the field under two levels of K fertilization (0 and 112 kg K ha(-1)) and two levels of aldicarb [2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde 0-methyicarbamoyloxime] application (0 and 1.68 kg a.i. ha(-1)) from 1999 through 2001. Reniform nematode numbers and above-ground dry matter partitioning were determined at various times in the growing season. Lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality were determined at the end of the season. Cotton grown with K fertilization hosted a 12% larger post-harvest population of reniform nematode than the unfertilized control plants. Plants grown without K fertilization averaged a 10% greater specific leaf weight than the K fertilized plants. Of the 9 genotypes grown, only PayMaster 1218BR increased lint yield (10%) in response to K fertilization. An interaction between aldicarb application and K fertilization for lint yield during the 2000 growing season indicated that both reniform nematode parasitism and insufficient K fertilization may impose limitations to lint yield production. Large reinform nematode populations may be suppressing the yield response to K fertilization. Production practices that encourage robust plant growth may enhance proliferation of existing reniform nematode populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1251
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOURCE-TO-SINK MANIPULATION EFFECTS ON COTTON LINT YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS
    PETTIGREW, WT
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (04) : 731 - 735
  • [2] Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution
    Pettigrew, WT
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (02) : 377 - 383
  • [3] EFFECTS OF YIELD COMPONENTS ON LINT YIELD OF UPLAND COTTON WITH HIGH FIBER STRENGTH
    HARRELL, DC
    CULP, TW
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1976, 16 (02) : 205 - 208
  • [4] Effect of corn-cotton rotations on reniform nematode populations and crop yield.
    Stetina, S. R.
    Young, L. D.
    Pettigrew, W. T.
    Bruns, H. A.
    [J]. NEMATROPICA, 2007, 37 (02) : 237 - 248
  • [5] EFFECTS OF POTASSIUM AND ZINC FERTILIZATION ON THE YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF ARTICHOKE
    Ozturk, Bilgehan
    Zengin, Mehmet
    Gokmen Yilmaz, Fatma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TEKIRDAG AGRICULTURE FACULTY-TEKIRDAG ZIRAAT FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2020, 17 (02): : 180 - 190
  • [6] Germplasm for genetic improvement of lint yield in Upland cotton: genetic analysis of lint yield with yield components
    Linghe Zeng
    Jixiang Wu
    [J]. Euphytica, 2012, 187 : 247 - 261
  • [7] Germplasm for genetic improvement of lint yield in Upland cotton: genetic analysis of lint yield with yield components
    Zeng, Linghe
    Wu, Jixiang
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 2012, 187 (02) : 247 - 261
  • [8] POTASSIUM NUTRITION EFFECTS ON LINT YIELD AND FIBER QUALITY OF ACALA COTTON
    CASSMAN, KG
    KERBY, TA
    ROBERTS, BA
    BRYANT, DC
    HIGASHI, SL
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (03) : 672 - 677
  • [9] COMPARISON OF ADJUVANT EFFECTS ON COTTON LEAF POTASSIUM CONCENTRATION AND LINT YIELD
    HEITHOLT, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1994, 17 (12) : 2221 - 2233
  • [10] Seed Quality and Planting Date Effects on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components, and Fiber Quality
    Pettigrew, William
    Meredith, William, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2009, 13 (02): : 37 - 47