Plasticity in foraging behaviour as a possible response to climate change

被引:16
|
作者
Evans, Matthew R. [1 ]
Moustakas, Aristides [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Biol & Chem Sci, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
关键词
TROPHIC INTERACTIONS; SHIFTS; PHENOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SENSITIVITY; PREDATORS; RANGES; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.08.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Climate change is regarded as one of the major concerns of the 21st Century, with mean temperatures expected to increase by about 3 degrees C over the next 100 years. Species responses to climate change are not consistent, with some species apparently able to respond more quickly than others, thus producing changes in community structure. One increasingly common observation is that species at lower trophic levels respond more quickly to change in climate than species at higher levels. This can result in, for example, the timing of a predator's peak food requirements being separated in time from the point at which their prey is most available. It has been suggested that this creates an additional risk for the persistence of species at high trophic levels as the climate alters; there is an alternative possibility - that predators may change their diets in response to changing prey availability. Models of diet choice make several predictions, for example they suggest that whether a predator includes a secondary prey into its diet depends on the availability of the primary prey and not on characteristics of the secondary prey. By switching between one prey type and another, a predator population may be able to persist in a particular location longer than they would otherwise. Using a simple demonstration model we show that this idea is theoretically plausible.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 66
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flexible foraging behaviour increases predator vulnerability to climate change
    Gauzens, Benoit
    Rosenbaum, Benjamin
    Kalinkat, Gregor
    Boy, Thomas
    Jochum, Malte
    Kortsch, Susanne
    O'Gorman, Eoin J.
    Brose, Ulrich
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 14 (04) : 387 - 392
  • [2] Genetic Constraints, Transcriptome Plasticity, and the Evolutionary Response to Climate Change
    Logan, Michael L.
    Cox, Christian L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [3] Phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change: the importance of cue variation
    Bonamour, Suzanne
    Chevin, Luis-Miguel
    Charmantier, Anne
    Teplitsky, Celine
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 374 (1768)
  • [4] Thermal Plasticity in Insects' Response to Climate Change and to Multifactorial Environments
    Rodrigues, Yara Katia
    Beldade, Patricia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 8
  • [5] CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR AND DEMAND RESPONSE OF TOURISTS TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    Gossling, Stefan
    Scott, Daniel
    Hall, C. Michael
    Ceron, Jean-Paul
    Dubois, Ghislain
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (01) : 36 - 58
  • [6] Phenotypic plasticity or evolutionary change? An examination of the phenological response of an arctic seabird to climate change
    Sauve, Drew
    Divoky, George
    Friesen, Vicki L.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 33 (11) : 2180 - 2190
  • [7] Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population
    Charmantier, Anne
    McCleery, Robin H.
    Cole, Lionel R.
    Perrins, Chris
    Kruuk, Loeske E. B.
    Sheldon, Ben C.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5877) : 800 - 803
  • [8] The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XVII. Response to climate change
    Scheiner, Samuel M.
    Barfield, Michael
    Holt, Robert D.
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2020, 13 (02): : 388 - 399
  • [9] Migratory behaviour constrains the phenological response of birds to climate change
    Rubolini, Diego
    Saino, Nicola
    Moller, Anders P.
    [J]. CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2010, 42 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [10] Behaviour change to address climate change
    Whitmarsh, Lorraine
    Poortinga, Wouter
    Capstick, Stuart
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 42 : 76 - 81