Improving thermophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure

被引:155
|
作者
Hansen, KH [1 ]
Angelidaki, I [1 ]
Ahring, BK [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00410-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Thermophilic (55 degrees C) anaerobic degradation of swine manure was found possible even at an ammonia content of 6 g-N/l, with a low methane yield of only 67 ml CH4/g-VS and a high concentration of volatile fatty acids (11.5 g acetate/l). Several methods were tested in order to increase the methane yield. Addition of 1.5% (w/w) activated carbon, 10% (w/w) glauconite or 1.5% (w/w) activated carbon and 10% (w/w) glauconite resulted in an increase of the methane yield to 126 ml CH4/g VS, 90 ml CH4/g VS and 195 ml CH4/g-VS respectively. Batch experiments showed that at an ammonia concentration of 4.6 g-N/l even small amounts of sulphide (23 mg S2-/l) inhibited biogas production. However, addition of activated carbon (2.5% (w/w)) or FeCl2 (4.4 mM) could counteract the inhibition which was mainly explained by a reduction of the sulphide content by adsorption to the activated carbon or precipitation as ferrous sulphide. The methane yield could be increased to 102 ml CH4/g-VS by switching off the stirrer half an hour before and after substrate addition, which was attributed to increased biomass retention due to improved sedimentation. Increasing the hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 15 to 30 days resulted in an increase of the methane yield to 182 ml CH4/g-VS. Addition of granules from a thermophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating volatile fatty acids gave only a temporary increase in the methane yield. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1805 / 1810
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STUDIES ON THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION OF SWINE MANURE
    FUJITA, M
    SCHARER, JM
    MOOYOUNG, M
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, (SEP): : 33 - 33
  • [2] Effects of oxytetracycline on mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion for biogas production from swine manure
    Zhang, Jingmiao
    Wu, Shuai
    Xia, Ao
    Feng, Dong
    Huang, Yun
    Zhu, Xianqing
    Zhu, Xun
    Liao, Qiang
    [J]. FUEL, 2023, 344
  • [3] Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of garbage, screened swine and dairy cattle manure
    Liu, Kai
    Tang, Yue-Qin
    Matsui, Toru
    Morimura, Shigeru
    Wu, Xiao-Lei
    Kida, Kenji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, 2009, 107 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [4] THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF SWINE MANURE
    HASHIMOTO, AG
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1983, 6 (03): : 175 - 191
  • [5] Stable thermophilic anaerobic digestion of dissolved air flotation (DAF) sludge by co-digestion with swine manure
    Creamer, K. S.
    Chen, Y.
    Williams, C. M.
    Cheng, J. J.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (09) : 3020 - 3024
  • [6] OPERATING AND PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF SCRAPED SWINE MANURE AS A THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION SUBSTRATE
    HILL, DT
    HOLMBERG, RD
    BOLTE, JP
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1985, 14 (01): : 37 - 49
  • [7] Growing Chlorella vulgaris on thermophilic anaerobic digestion swine manure for nutrient removal and biomass production
    Deng, Xiang-Yuan
    Gao, Kun
    Zhang, Ren-Chuan
    Addy, Min
    Lu, Qian
    Ren, Hong-Yan
    Chen, Paul
    Liu, Yu-Huan
    Ruan, Roger
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 243 : 417 - 425
  • [8] Influence of initial pH on thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and maize stalk
    Zhang, Tong
    Mao, Chunlan
    Zhai, Ningning
    Wang, Xiaojiao
    Yang, Gaihe
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 : 119 - 126
  • [9] KINETIC-PARAMETERS OF THERMOPHILIC DIGESTION OF SWINE MANURE
    CHEN, TH
    DAY, DL
    PFEFFER, JT
    BRYANT, MP
    VANDERHOLM, DH
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1984, 27 (05): : 1491 - 1498
  • [10] Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Inhibition by ammonia
    Hansen, KH
    Angelidaki, I
    Ahring, BK
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (01) : 5 - 12