Identifying gram-negative and gram-positive clinical mastitis using daily milk component and behavioral sensor data

被引:6
|
作者
Steele, N. M. [1 ,2 ]
Dicke, A. [3 ]
De Vries, A. [4 ]
Lacy-Hulbert, S. J. [2 ]
Liebe, D. [5 ]
White, R. R. [5 ]
Petersson-Wolfe, C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Dairy Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] DairyNZ Ltd, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[3] Farm Credit, Bellefontaine, OH 43311 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Anim Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[5] Virginia Tech, Dept Anim & Poultry Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
sensor data; pathogen type; slope change; MICROBIAL NITROGEN FLOWS; DAIRY-COWS; HEALTH DISORDERS; IDENTIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; YIELD; TIME; METAANALYSIS; PATTERNS; QUARTER;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2019-16742
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Opportunities exist for automated animal health monitoring and early detection of diseases such as mastitis with greater on-farm adoption of precision technologies. Our objective was to evaluate time series changes in individual milk component or behavioral variables for all clinical mastitis (CM) cases (ACM), for CM caused by gram-negative (GN) or gram-positive (GP) pathogens, or CM cases in which no pathogen was isolated (NPI). We developed algorithms using a combination of milk and activity parameters for predicting each of these infection types. Milk and activity data were collated for the 14 d preceding a CM event (n = 170) and for controls (n = 166) matched for breed, parity, and days in milk. Explanatory variables in the univariate and multiple regression models were the slope change in milk (milk yield, conductivity, somatic cell count, lactase percentage, protein percentage, and fat percentage) and activity parameters (steps, lying time, lying bout duration, and number of lying bouts) over 7 d. Slopes were estimated using linear regression between d -7 and -5, d -7 and -4, d -7 and -3, d -7 and 2, and d 7 and 1 relative to CM detection for all parameters. Univariate analyses determined significant slope ranges for explanatory variables against the 4 responses: ACM, GN, GP, and NPI. Next, all slope ranges were offered into the multivariate models for the same 4 responses using 3 baselines: d -10, -7, and -3 relative to CM detection. In the univariate analysis, no explanatory variables were significant indicators of ACM, whereas at least 1 parameter was significant for each of GN, GP, and NPI models. Superior sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) estimates were observed for the best GP (Se = 82%, Sp = 87%) and NPI (Se = 80%, Sp = 94%) multiple regression models compared with the best ACM (Se = 73%, Sp = 75%) and GN (Se = 71%, Sp = 74%) models. Sensitivity for the GN model was greater at the baseline closest to the day of CM detection (d -3), whereas the opposite was observed for the GP and NPI model as Se was maximized at the d -10 baseline. Based on this screening of relationships, milk and activity sensor data could be used in CM detection systems.
引用
收藏
页码:2602 / 2614
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of repeated gram-positive and gram-negative clinical mastitis episodes on milk yield loss in Holstein dairy cows
    Schukken, Y. H.
    Hertl, J.
    Bar, D.
    Bennett, G. J.
    Gonzalez, R. N.
    Rauch, B. J.
    Santisteban, C.
    Schulte, H. F.
    Tauer, L.
    Welcome, F. L.
    Groehn, Y. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (07) : 3091 - 3105
  • [2] PROBLEMATIC GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    KAYSER, FH
    [J]. HELVETICA CHIRURGICA ACTA, 1978, 45 (4-5) : 443 - 451
  • [3] Is it better for a bacterium to be gram-positive or gram-negative?
    Orsi, N
    Fabozzi, G
    Ambrosi, C
    Visca, P
    [J]. IUBMB LIFE, 2004, 56 (06) : 361 - 363
  • [4] ECOLOGY OF GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS
    FARMER, K
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1968, 279 (04): : 219 - &
  • [5] SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CLINICAL ISOLATES OF GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS TO CEFATRIZINE
    CARLONE, NA
    CUFFINI, AM
    FORNO, PM
    CAVALLO, G
    [J]. DRUGS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1985, 11 (07) : 447 - 451
  • [6] THE SENSITIVITY OF GRAM-NEGATIVE AND GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA TO OFLOXACIN
    SPECIALE, A
    STEFANI, S
    CACCAMO, F
    NICOLOSI, VM
    NICOLETTI, G
    [J]. DRUGS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (09) : 555 - 561
  • [7] Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial extracellular vesicles
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Lee, Jaewook
    Park, Jaesung
    Gho, Yong Song
    [J]. SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 40 : 97 - 104
  • [8] FACTORS OF PATHOGENICITY IN GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    FEHRENBA.FJ
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR BAKTERIOLOGIE MIKROBIOLOGIE UND HYGIENE SERIES A-MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY INFECTIOUS DISEASES VIROLOGY PARASITOLOGY, 1974, 227 (1-4): : 146 - 149
  • [9] IMPERMEABILITY TO QUINOLONES IN GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    BRYAN, LE
    BEDARD, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1991, 10 (04) : 232 - 239
  • [10] Electropermeabilization responses in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
    Chaturongakul, Soraya
    Kirawanich, Phumin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 2013, 71 (04) : 773 - 777