共 36 条
Quantitative indices of dynamics in concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) as prognostic factors in severe sepsis/septic shock patients - Comparison with CRP and procalcitonin
被引:16
|作者:
Mierzchala, Magdalena
[1
]
Krzystek-Korpacka, Malgorzata
[1
]
Gamian, Andrzej
[1
,2
]
Durek, Grazyna
[3
]
机构:
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Med Biochem, PL-50368 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Immunol & Expt Therapy, PL-53114 Wroclaw, Poland
[3] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, PL-50368 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词:
Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP);
Procalcitonin (PCT);
C-reactive protein (CRP);
Severe sepsis;
Septic shock;
Chain index;
Biomarker;
APACHE II;
SOFA;
Prognostic factor;
SEVERE SEPSIS;
ORGAN FAILURE;
TIME-COURSE;
MARKER;
SERUM;
BIOMARKERS;
LPS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.01.012
中图分类号:
R446 [实验室诊断];
R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Objectives: To devise and evaluate quantitative indices of dynamics in lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), CRP, and procalcitonin concentrations as prognostic markers in sepsis. Design and methods: Prospective observational cross-sectional study with 5-day follow-up. Simple (Delta(5-1)) and relative (chain indices-based) rates for LBP (ELISA), procalcitonin (immunoluminometry), and CRP were devised. Results: Admission concentrations of all markers were higher in septic patients than controls. Not the admission levels but markers' time-courses differed between survivors (declining) and non-survivors (persistently high). Simple and relative rates were greater in survivors than non-survivors. Their accuracies as outcome predictors were comparable, higher for LBP and CRP than PCT. At similar to 95% sensitivity, the highest specificity had LBP relative and simple rates. Except for sepsis severity scores, only LBP was independently associated with lethal outcome. Conclusions: For outcome prediction, the evaluation of dynamics of sepsis mediators, expressed by simple or relative rates, is a more suitable alternative to markers' peak values. (C) 2011 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 363
页数:7
相关论文