Rejoinder to the Critiques of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report

被引:3
|
作者
Benbow, Camilla Persson [1 ]
Faulkner, Larry R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Peabody Coll, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Houston Endowment, Houston, TX 77002 USA
关键词
assessment; curricula; education policy; instruction; learning; mathematics education; National Mathematics Advisory Panel; research methodology; standards of evidence; teacher education; teachers;
D O I
10.3102/0013189X08329195
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The authors respond to comments and criticisms made of Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Given the requirements of the president's executive order, constraints of time, and the need to make recommendations generalizable to national policy, the Panel adopted appropriately high evidentiary standards for its recommendations. The authors also respond to criticisms voiced on Panel findings regarding mathematics curricula, instructional practices, learning processes, teachers and teacher education, and assessment. While scholars should continue to develop promising programs of research, experimental or otherwise, the report offers a solid basis for improving math achievement.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 648
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条