Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen <20 ng/ml

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Xuan [1 ]
Wang, Jian-Ye [1 ]
Li, Chun-Mei [2 ]
Zhang, Ya-Qun [1 ]
Wang, Jian-Long [1 ]
Wan, Ben [1 ]
Zhang, Wei [3 ]
Chen, Min [2 ]
Li, Sa-Ying [2 ]
Wan, Gang [4 ]
Liu, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Ditan Hosp, Dept Med Stat, Beijing 100015, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnosis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate Cancer; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PERIPHERAL ZONE; SCORING SYSTEM; BIOPSY; LESIONS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.183419
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The European Society of Urogenital Radiology has built the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for standardizing the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). This study evaluated the PI-RADS diagnosis method in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/ml. Methods: A total of 133 patients with PSA < 20 ng/ml were prospectively recruited. T2-weighted (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance images of the prostate were acquired before a 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy. Each patient's peripheral zone was divided into six regions on the images; each region corresponded to two of the 12 biopsy cores. T2WI, DWI, and T2WI + DWI scores were computed according to PI-RADS. The diagnostic accuracy of the PI-RADS score was evaluated using histopathology of prostate biopsies as the reference standard. Results: PCa was histologically diagnosed in 169 (21.2%) regions. Increased PI-RADS score correlated positively with increased cancer detection rate. The cancer detection rate for scores 1 to 5 was 2.8%, 15.0%, 34.6%, 52.6%, and 88.9%, respectively, using T2WI and 12.0%, 20.2%, 48.0%, 85.7%, and 93.3%, respectively, using DWI. For T2WI + DWI, the cancer detection rate was 1.5% (score 2), 13.5% (scores 3-4), 41.3% (scores 5-6), 75.9% (scores 7-8), and 92.3% (scores 9-10). The area under the curve for cancer detection was 0.700 (T2WI), 0.735 (DWI) and 0.749 (T2WI + DWI). The sensitivity and specificity were 53.8% and 89.2%, respectively, when using scores 5-6 as the cutoff value for T2WI + DWI. Conclusions: The PI-RADS score correlates with the PCa detection rate in patients with PSA<20 ng/ml. The summed score of T2WI + DWI has the highest accuracy in detection of PCa. However, the sensitivity should be further improved.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1438
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen <20 ng/ml
    Wang Xuan
    Wang Jian-Ye
    Li Chun-Mei
    Zhang Ya-Qun
    Wang Jian-Long
    Wan Ben
    Zhang Wei
    Chen Min
    Li Sa-Ying
    Wan Gang
    Liu Ming
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2016, (12) : 1432 - 1438
  • [2] Combining Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Histogram Analysis, and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Determine the Risk of Prostate Cancer in Patients With Prostate-Specific Antigen of 4 to 20 ng/mL
    Liu, Xiaohang
    Deng, Lin
    Zhou, Liangping
    Peng, Weijun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (04) : 645 - 651
  • [3] Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Hoshii, Tatsuhiko
    Nishiyama, Tsutomu
    Toyabe, Shinichi
    Akazawa, Kohei
    Komatsu, Shuichi
    Kaneko, Masaaki
    Hara, Noboru
    Takahashi, Kota
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) : 305 - 310
  • [4] Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen &gt;20 ng/ml
    Ou, YC
    Chen, JT
    Cheng, CL
    Ho, HC
    Yang, CR
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 33 (11) : 574 - 579
  • [5] The Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Strategy to Avoid Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Tosev, Georgi
    Guettlein, Maximilian
    Leichsenring, Jonas
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Bonekamp, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Nyaboe
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (02): : 325 - 331
  • [6] Men's Acceptance of Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate Biopsy
    Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud
    Pettersson, Christina
    Svensson, Linda
    Kohestani, Kimia
    Bratt, Karin Stinesen
    Wallstrom, Jonas
    Mansson, Marianne
    Hellstrom, Mikael
    Hugosson, Jonas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (03): : 553 - 562
  • [7] Virtual Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Closer to Reality in a Subgroup of Prostate Cancer Patients?
    Pomykala, Kelsey L.
    Herrmann, Ken
    Emmett, Louise
    Lalumera, Elisabetta
    Fanti, Stefano
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 11 - 12
  • [8] Diagnostic efficacy of free prostate-specific antigen/total prostate-specific antigen ratio for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in low concentration (≤4 ng/ml) and intermediate levels of total prostate-specific antigen (4.01-10.0 ng/ml)
    Caliskan, Selahattin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (02) : 279 - 283
  • [9] Prognosis of prostate cancer with initial prostate-specific antigen >1,000 ng/mL at diagnosis
    Kan, Hung-Cheng
    Hou, Chen-Pang
    Lin, Yu-Hsiang
    Tsui, Ke-Hung
    Chang, Phei-Lang
    Chen, Chien-Lun
    [J]. ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 2943 - 2949
  • [10] The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels.
    Kamoi, K.
    Okihara, K.
    Takaha, N.
    Nakamura, T.
    Hongo, F.
    Naito, Y.
    Kawauchi, A.
    Miki, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)