Life cycle assessment of fuel selection for power generation, in Taiwan

被引:8
|
作者
Yang, Ying-Hsien
Lin, Sue-Jane
Lewis, Charles
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Sustainable Environm Res Ctr, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Resources Engn, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.3155/1047-3289.57.11.1387
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to performance data from 1997-2002 to evaluate the environmental impacts of the energy input, airborne emission, waterborne emission, and solid waste inventories for Taiwan's electric power plants. Eco-indicator 95 was used to compare the differences among the generation processes and fuel purification. To better understand the environmental trends related to Taiwan's electric power industry, three fuel scenarios were selected. for LCA system analysis. Results indicate that there are differences in characteristic environmental impact among the 13 power plants. Scenario simulation provided a basis for minimizing environmental impacts from fuel selection targets. Fuel selection priority should be a gas-fired combined cycle substituted for a coal-fired steam turbine to be more environmentally friendly, particularly in the areas of the greenhouse effect, acidification, winter smog, and solid waste. Furthermore, based purely on economic and environmental criteria, it is recommended that the gas-fired combined cycle be substituted for the oil-fired steam turbine.
引用
收藏
页码:1387 / 1395
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of a SOFC system for distributed power generation
    Strazza, Carlo
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    Costamagna, Paola
    Gallo, Michela
    Brignole, Emma
    Girdinio, Paola
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 100 : 64 - 77
  • [2] A review on life cycle assessment approach on thermal power generation
    Malode, Satyajit
    Mohanta, Jagadish Chandra
    Prakash, Ravi
    [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 56 : 791 - 798
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of yard tractors using hydrogen fuel at the Port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan
    Chang, Ching-Chih
    Huang, Po-Chien
    Tu, Jhih-Sheng
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 189
  • [4] LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF POWER GENERATION AND COMBINED HEAT AND POWER GENERATION BY WOODY BIOMASS
    Komata, Hirotaka
    Ishikawa, Yoshio
    Ishiko, Syuhei
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 736 - 740
  • [5] FUEL CYCLE AND POWER-GENERATION
    UEMATSU, K
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1972, 15 (02): : 594 - +
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of domestic fuel cell micro combined heat and power generation: Exploring influential factors
    Bachmann, Till M.
    Carnicelli, Federica
    Preiss, Philipp
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (07) : 3891 - 3905
  • [7] Exergoenvironmental evaluation for combined cycle power generation system based on life cycle assessment
    Wang, Guang-Zhu
    Chen, Jian-Hong
    Hong, Xi-Liang
    Wang, Xiao-Rong
    Chen, Qiang-Feng
    Sheng, De-Ren
    Li, Wei
    [J]. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53 (05): : 972 - 980
  • [8] The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass
    Shen, Xinhua
    Kommalapati, Raghava R.
    Huque, Ziaul
    [J]. Sustainability, 2015, 7 (10): : 12974 - 12987
  • [9] A life cycle assessment of the Brazilian coal used for electric power generation
    Restrepo, Alvaro
    Bazzo, Edson
    Miyake, Raphael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 179 - 186
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation technologies: An updated review
    Tomasini-Montenegro, C.
    Santoyo-Castelazo, E.
    Gujba, H.
    Romero, R. J.
    Santoyo, E.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 114 : 1119 - 1136