Carbon and water footprints of major cereal crops production in China

被引:43
|
作者
Zhang, Guo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiaoke [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Lu [3 ]
Xiong, Kangning [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Chunyan
Lu, Fei [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Hong [6 ]
Zheng, Hua [3 ,5 ]
Ouyang, Zhiyun [3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Normal Univ, Inst Karst Res, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
[2] State Engn Technol Inst Karst Desertficat Control, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[4] China Joint Ctr Global Change Studies, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, State Key Lab Integrated Management Pest & Rodent, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[6] Transportat Res Inst Jiangxi Prov, Nanchang 330020, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon footprint; Gray water; Greenhouse gas; Management practice; Mitigation; Soil carbon sequestration; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CONSERVATION TILLAGE; GRAIN PRODUCTION; WINTER-WHEAT; STRAW RETURN; DURUM-WHEAT; GREY WATER; NITROGEN; SOIL; SEQUESTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and freshwater scarcity are central environmental concerns in China. They are closely linked to crop production. Based on a national-scale survey and statistics, we estimated the carbon footprint (CF) and water footprint (WF) of rice, wheat, and corn in China in 2011. The GHG emissions were 9.9, 3.9, and 3.7 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per hectare (t CO(2)e ha(-1)) for rice, wheat, and corn, respectively. Carbon sequestration due to straw return mitigated 202-478 kg CO(2)e ha(-1). Therefore, the farm CFs were 9.7, 3.5, and 3.4 t CO(2)e ha(-1) for rice, wheat, and corn; while the product CFs were 1.4, 0.7, and 0.6 kg CO(2)e kg(-1) respectively. The product WFs were 1.5, 1.1, and 1 m(3) kg(-1) for rice, wheat, and corn, respectively. Blue water made a greater contribution to WF in the north and northwest than to the other regions, and gray water occupied 27% of the total WF. Our results indicated that cereal production in China depended more on fertilization and irrigation than global average production requirements. The significantly positive relationships between the CF and WF indicated the possibility for simultaneous mitigation. Based on our results and other studies, we recommended potential practices, especially optimized fertilization and irrigation, and straw returns, to mitigate GHG emissions and water use to achieve environmentally sustainable agriculture in China. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 623
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy and water footprints of cereal production in China
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Bai, Yueyang
    Ji, Changxing
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 164
  • [2] Carbon and Nitrogen Footprints of Major Cereal Crop Production in China: A Study Based on Farm Management Surveys
    Xu Chunchun
    Chen Zhongdu
    Ji Long
    Lu Jianfei
    [J]. RICE SCIENCE, 2022, 29 (03) : 288 - 298
  • [3] Carbon and Nitrogen Footprints of Major Cereal Crop Production in China: A Study Based on Farm Management Surveys
    XU Chunchun
    CHEN Zhongdu
    JI Long
    LU Jianfei
    [J]. Rice Science, 2022, (03) : 288 - 299
  • [4] Carbon and Nitrogen Footprints of Major Cereal Crop Production in China: A Study Based on Farm Management Surveys
    XU Chunchun
    CHEN Zhongdu
    JI Long
    LU Jianfei
    [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29 (03) : 288 - 299
  • [5] Carbon and water footprints of major crop production in India
    Nayak, Amaresh Kumar
    Tripathi, Rahul
    Debnath, Manish
    Swain, Chinmaya Kumar
    Dhal, Biswaranjan
    Vijaykumar, Shanmugam
    Nayak, Anshuman Debasis
    Mohanty, Sangita
    Shahid, Mohammad
    Kumar, Anjani
    Rajak, Manoj
    Moharana, Khitish Chandra
    Chatterjee, Dibyendu
    Munda, Susmita
    Guru, Pravat
    Khanam, Rubina
    Lal, Banwari
    Gautam, Priyanka
    Pattanaik, Suschismita
    Shukla, Arvind Kumar
    Fitton, Nuala
    Smith, Pete
    Pathak, Himanshu
    [J]. PEDOSPHERE, 2023, 33 (03) : 448 - 462
  • [6] Carbon and water footprints of major crop production in India
    Amaresh Kumar NAYAK
    Rahul TRIPATHI
    Manish DEBNATH
    Chinmaya Kumar SWAIN
    Biswaranjan DHAL
    Shanmugam VIJAYKUMAR
    Anshuman Debasis NAYAK
    Sangita MOHANTY
    Mohammad SHAHID
    Anjani KUMAR
    Manoj RAJAK
    Khitish Chandra MOHARANA
    Dibyendu CHATTERJEE
    Susmita MUNDA
    Pravat GURU
    Rubina KHANAM
    Banwari LAL
    Priyanka GAUTAM
    Suschismita PATTANAIK
    Arvind Kumar SHUKLA
    Nuala FITTON
    Pete SMITH
    Himanshu PATHAK
    [J]. Pedosphere, 2023, (03) : 448 - 462
  • [7] Carbon and water footprints of major crop production in India
    Amaresh Kumar NAYAK
    Rahul TRIPATHI
    Manish DEBNATH
    Chinmaya Kumar SWAIN
    Biswaranjan DHAL
    Shanmugam VIJAYKUMAR
    Anshuman Debasis NAYAK
    Sangita MOHANTY
    Mohammad SHAHID
    Anjani KUMAR
    Manoj RAJAK
    Khitish Chandra MOHARANA
    Dibyendu CHATTERJEE
    Susmita MUNDA
    Pravat GURU
    Rubina KHANAM
    Banwari LAL
    Priyanka GAUTAM
    Suschismita PATTANAIK
    Arvind Kumar SHUKLA
    Nuala FITTON
    Pete SMITH
    Himanshu PATHAK
    [J]. Pedosphere, 2023, 33 (03) : 448 - 462
  • [8] A Sustainability Assessment of Five Major Food Crops' Water Footprints in China from 1978 to 2010
    Tian, Yuanhong
    Ruth, Matthias
    Zhu, Dajian
    Ding, Jinfeng
    Morris, Nicholas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
  • [9] Spatiotemporal variations of water, land, and carbon footprints of pig production in China
    Wu, Huijun
    Chen, Xinyue
    Zhang, Ling
    Liu, Xin
    Jiang, Songyan
    Liu, Yongxin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (11)
  • [10] Spatial and temporal patterns of carbon footprints of grain crops in China
    Xu, Xiaoming
    Lan, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 146 : 218 - 227