A comparison of three brain-computer interfaces based on event-related desynchronization, steady state visual evoked potentials, or a hybrid approach using both signals

被引:54
|
作者
Brunner, C. [1 ]
Allison, B. Z. [1 ]
Altstaetter, C. [1 ]
Neuper, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Knowledge Discovery, Lab Brain Comp Interfaces, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, Dept Psychol, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
EEG;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025010
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems rely on the direct measurement of brain signals, such as event-related desynchronization (ERD), steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), P300s, or slow cortical potentials. Unfortunately, none of these BCI approaches work for all users. This study compares two conventional BCI approaches (ERD and SSVEP) within subjects, and also evaluates a novel hybrid BCI based on a combination of these signals. We recorded EEG data from 12 subjects across three conditions. In the first condition, subjects imagined moving both hands or both feet (ERD). In the second condition, subjects focused on one of the two oscillating visual stimuli (SSVEP). In the third condition, subjects simultaneously performed both tasks. We used logarithmic band power features at sites and frequencies consistent with ERD and SSVEP activity, and subjects received real-time feedback based on their performance. Subjects also completed brief questionnaires. All subjects could simultaneously perform the movement and visual task in the hybrid condition even though most subjects had little or no training. All subjects showed both SSVEP and ERD activity during the hybrid task, consistent with the activity in both single tasks. Subjects generally considered the hybrid condition moderately more difficult, but all of them were able to complete the hybrid task. Results support the hypothesis that subjects who do not have strong ERD activity might be more effective with an SSVEP BCI, and suggest that SSVEP BCIs work for more subjects. A simultaneous hybrid BCI is feasible, although the current hybrid approach, which involves combining ERD and SSVEP in a two-choice task to improve accuracy, is not significantly better than a comparable SSVEP BCI. Switching to an SSVEP BCI could increase reliability in subjects who have trouble producing the EEG activity necessary to use an ERD BCI. Subjects who are proficient in both BCI approaches might be able to combine these approaches in different ways and for different goals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of Phase in Brain-Computer Interfaces based on Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials
    Lopez-Gordo, M. A.
    Prieto, A.
    Pelayo, F.
    Morillas, C.
    [J]. NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2010, 32 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [2] Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials:: Suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces?
    Müller-Putz, GR
    Scherer, R
    Neuper, C
    Pfurtscheller, G
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2006, 14 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [3] Advancing the detection of steady-state visual evoked potentials in brain-computer interfaces
    Abu-Alqumsan, Mohammad
    Peer, Angelika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (03)
  • [4] Processing and Decoding Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Chumerin, Nikolay
    Manyakov, Nikolay V.
    van Vliet, Marijn
    Robben, Arne
    Combaz, Adrien
    Van Hulle, Marc M.
    [J]. DIGITAL IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS, 2012, : 1 - 33
  • [5] Investigation of Brain-Computer Interfaces That Apply Sound-Evoked Event-Related Potentials
    Kogure, Masumi
    Matsuzaki, Shuichi
    Wada, Yasuhiro
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS-ICANN 2010, PT I, 2010, 6352 : 127 - 134
  • [6] Towards an Optimization of Stimulus Parameters for Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials
    Duszyk, Anna
    Bierzynska, Maria
    Radzikowska, Zofia
    Milanowski, Piotr
    Kus, Rafal
    Suffczynski, Piotr
    Michalska, Magdalena
    Labecki, Maciej
    Zwolinski, Piotr
    Durka, Piotr
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [7] Unsupervised Learning for Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Event-Related Potentials: Review and Online Comparison
    Huebner, David
    Verhoeven, Thibault
    Mueller, Klaus-Robert
    Kindermans, Pieter-Jan
    Tangermann, Michael
    [J]. IEEE COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MAGAZINE, 2018, 13 (02) : 66 - 77
  • [8] Brain-computer Interface Based on Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials
    Friganovic, K.
    Medved, M.
    Cifrek, M.
    [J]. 2016 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MICROELECTRONICS (MIPRO), 2016, : 391 - 395
  • [9] Statistical Characterization of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials and Their Use in Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Lopez, Miguel A.
    Pelayo, Francisco
    Madrid, Eduardo
    Prieto, Alberto
    [J]. NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2009, 29 (03) : 179 - 187
  • [10] Waveform-Coded Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Nakanishi, Masaki
    Tanji, Yutaro
    Tanaka, Toshihisa
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 144768 - 144775