Single vs. multiple drug prevention: Is more always better?: A pilot study

被引:18
|
作者
Werch, CEC
Moore, MM
Diclemente, CC
Owen, DM
Carlson, JM
Jobli, E
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Addict & Hlth Behav Res Inst, Jacksonville, FL 32216 USA
[2] Univ N Florida, Dept Publ Hlth, Jacksonville, FL 32216 USA
[3] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Psychol, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
关键词
single drug prevention; multiple drug prevention; drug program foci; differential program effects; adolescents;
D O I
10.1081/JA-200030814
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a single drug, i.e., alcohol, against a multiple drug preventive intervention. Methods. A controlled trial was conducted with 448 8th grade students (mean age = 13 years old) from an inner-city middle school (n = 216) and a rural junior high school (n = 232) in 2000-2001. Students were randomized within school, and 3-month post-intervention follow-up data were collected. Results. Two risk/protective factors were found to differ significantly in favor of youth receiving the single drug alcohol intervention (p's = 0.03), while the frequency of alcohol use and two additional risk/protective factors approached significance (p's < 0.10). Conclusion. These findings support the potential efficacy of a brief, single drug preventive intervention over a brief, multi-drug intervention in producing short-term alcohol outcomes for adolescents, and indicate differential effects of interventions for subgroups of substance using youth.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1101
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The More, the Better?! Multiple vs. Single Jobholders' Job Satisfaction as a Matter of Lacked Information
    Kottwitz, Maria U.
    Huenefeld, Lena
    Frank, Benjamin P.
    Otto, Kathleen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [2] When prevention is a risk. More is not always better
    Baratta, Sergio
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (05) : 485 - 486
  • [3] HYBRID VS. MONOLITHIC - IS MORE MONOLITHIC BETTER?
    Yamasaki, Hiro
    Maki, Douglas W.
    Microwave journal, 1982, 25 (11): : 98 - 100
  • [4] Optimal investment in HIV prevention programs: more is not always better
    Brandeau, Margaret L.
    Zaric, Gregory S.
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 12 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [5] Optimal investment in HIV prevention programs: more is not always better
    Margaret L. Brandeau
    Gregory S. Zaric
    Health Care Management Science, 2009, 12 : 27 - 37
  • [6] Single vs. Dual Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing PCI: Is More Support Better?
    Miklin, Daniel J.
    Bimal, Tia
    Ukrani, Janta
    Fishbein, Joanna
    Gruberg, Luis
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S25 - S25
  • [7] Block-and-replace vs. titration antithyroid drug regimen for Graves' hyperthyroidism: two is not always better than one
    Duntas, L. H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 44 (06) : 1337 - 1339
  • [8] Block-and-replace vs. titration antithyroid drug regimen for Graves’ hyperthyroidism: two is not always better than one
    L. H. Duntas
    Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 2021, 44 : 1337 - 1339
  • [9] IS MORE COMPETITION ALWAYS BETTER? AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF EXTORTIONARY CORRUPTION
    Ryvkin, Dmitry
    Serra, Danila
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2019, 57 (01) : 50 - 72
  • [10] Multicomponent chemical enhancer formulations for transdermal drug delivery: More is not always better
    Arora, Anubhav
    Kisak, Edward
    Karande, Pankaj
    Newsam, John
    Mitragotri, Samir
    JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2010, 144 (02) : 175 - 180