Not Worth the Net Worth? The Democratic Dilemmas of Privileged Access to Information

被引:7
|
作者
Rosen, Guri [1 ]
Stie, Anne Elizabeth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, ARENA Ctr European Studies, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Agder, Dept Polit Sci & Management, N-4630 Kristiansand, Norway
来源
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE | 2017年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
democratic accountability; European Parliament; European Union; secrecy; transparency; EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT; TRANSPARENCY; EU; SECRETS; SECURITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.17645/pag.v5i3.946
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In this article, we discuss the democratic conditions for parliamentary oversight in EU foreign affairs. Our point of departure is two Interinstitutional Agreements (IIAs) between the Council and the European Parliament (EP), which provide the latter with access to sensitive documents. To shed light on this issue, we ask to what extent these contribute to the democratic accountability in EU foreign policy? It is argued that the IIAs have strengthened the EP's role in EU foreign affairs by giving it access to information to which it was previously denied. This does not mean, however, that this increase in power equals a strengthening of the EP as a democratic accountability forum. First of all, both IIAs (even if there are differences between them) fail to maximise the likelihood that the plurality of views in the EP as a whole is reproduced. Secondly, and more importantly, the EU citizens are largely deprived of opportunities to appraise how their elected representatives have exercised their role as guardians of executive power.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条