What Is and What Is Not Mathematical Modelling in Primary School: Opinions of Slovenian and Croatian Primary School Teachers

被引:0
|
作者
Junger, Mateja Sabo [1 ]
Lipovec, Alenka [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Teacher Educ, Savska cesta 77, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Univ Maribor, Fac Nat Sci & Math, Fac Educ, Koroska cesta 160, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
关键词
cross-country comparison; mathematical models; mathematics; teacher education; primary school; INQUIRY;
D O I
10.15516/cje.v24i2.4451
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Every day we encounter various obstacles and tasks that we solve with the help of mathematics, consciously or unconsciously. Mathematical modelling in teaching is an important interactive process in which students are introduced to problems from the real world and their environment. All education is slowly striving for students??? better education on problem-solving, including mathematical modelling, but this is not yet the practice in the lower grades of elementary schools. Our research describes what mathematical modelling actually is in primary school and its advantages and difficulties, all from the point of view of the primary school teachers themselves. The research was conducted on 1000 primary school teachers from Croatia and Slovenia. The study results show almost no differences according to the originating country even though we expected some since Slovenia had previously introduced mathematical modelling into its curricula. Results also indicate that teachers are fairly uneducated on the topic of mathematical modelling, and the difficulties that could arise from its introduction into the classroom. It can also be reported that teachers are eager and ready for education on a given topic, and in the vast majority show interest in additional much-needed education.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 568
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MATHEMATICAL MODELLING IN PRIMARY EDUCATION. OPINIONS OF SLOVENIAN AND CROATIAN TEACHERS ON TEACHING MATHEMATICAL MODELLING IN EARLY PRIMARY EDUCATION
    Junger, Mateja Sabo
    Lipovec, Alenka
    OPPORTUNITIES IN LEARNING AND TEACHING ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS, 2019, : 355 - 363
  • [2] A Discussion of What Makes a Good Teacher: Opinions of Pre-Service Primary School Teachers
    Hosgorur, Tugba
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW HORIZONS IN EDUCATION - INTE 2012, 2012, 55 : 451 - 460
  • [3] What does "Nanoscience -Nanotechnology" mean to primary school teachers?
    Manou, Leonidas
    Spyrtou, Anna
    Hatzikraniotis, Euripides
    Kariotoglou, Petros
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2022, 20 (06) : 1269 - 1290
  • [4] What Deters Primary School Teachers From Using ICT?
    Tapiska, Silvija
    Kresoja, Milena
    Putnik, Zoran
    Ivanovic, Mirjana
    2016 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS (SISY), 2016, : 193 - 197
  • [5] What does “Nanoscience –Nanotechnology” mean to primary school teachers?
    Leonidas Manou
    Anna Spyrtou
    Euripides Hatzikraniotis
    Petros Kariotoglou
    International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2022, 20 : 1269 - 1290
  • [6] Differences in Teachers' Opinions of Grading Styles in Croatian Language Classes in Lower Grades of Primary School
    Margetic, Nikola
    CROATIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-HRVATSKI CASOPIS ZA ODGOJ I OBRAZOVANJE, 2014, 16 (02): : 421 - 443
  • [7] The Opinions of Primary School Teachers on their Creative Thinking Skills
    Erdem, Ali Riza
    Adiguzel, Duygu Cag
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, (80): : 25 - 37
  • [8] Analysis of Primary School Teachers' Opinions on Family Diversity
    Capano Bosch, Alvaro
    Massonnier, Natalie
    Gonzalez Tornaria, Maria del L.
    PROPOSITOS Y REPRESENTACIONES, 2016, 4 (02): : 45 - 71
  • [9] Program reform in primary schools in turkey: what do primary school teachers think?
    Gultekin, Mehmet
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON LEARNING, TEACHING AND ADMINISTRATION PAPERS, 2010, 9
  • [10] The quality of primary and secondary school teachers in the Netherlands: what's the issue?
    van Veen, K.
    PEDAGOGISCHE STUDIEN, 2011, 88 (06): : 433 - 442