Multi-period Enviro-Economic Optimization of Municipal Solid Waste to Electricity

被引:4
|
作者
Octavianthy, Desti [1 ,2 ]
Syauqi, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
Reyseliani, Nadhilah [1 ,2 ]
Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok 16424, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Sustainable Energy Syst & Policy Res Cluster, Depok 16424, Indonesia
关键词
Enviro-economic; Pyrolysis; Municipal solid waste; Multi-objective optimization; Waste to energy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; TO-ENERGY; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CARBON CAPTURE; FAST PYROLYSIS; COMBINED HEAT; POWER-SYSTEM; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s12649-022-01758-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increased production of municipal solid waste has adverse effects on the environment, such as increased greenhouse gas emissions, which drive climate change and accelerate global warming. Waste to energy (WtE) conversion is one of the solutions whereby waste is used to generate energy and mitigate the adverse effects of waste accumulation on the environment. This study proposes a method to select an optimum WtE technology based on multi-objective optimization through enviro-economic analysis of municipal solid waste conversion into electricity using various technologies, such as anaerobic digestion, incineration, gasification, and pyrolysis, and coupled with power generation technologies such as gas engine, gas turbine, steam turbine, solid-oxide fuel cell, and molten carbonate fuel cell technology, in multiple periods (2020-2050), these technologies are simulated using Aspen Plus. An optimization model was developed using General Algebraic Modeling System to determine optimum technologies with the minimum levelized cost of electricity and emission intensity. The energy efficiency of the studied power generation technologies has been validated with the literature and it is found that the deviation is only less than 4% which is within the acceptable range. From the parametric analysis, all the technologies experience cost reduction with GASIF+SOFC has the highest cost reduction with 58.5% from 2020 to 2050. The result shows that the optimum technologies for 2020-2030 period, is pyrolysis combined with a gas engine. The optimum technologies for 2035-2040 and 2045-2050 are pyrolysis with a gas turbine and gasification with solid-oxide fuel cell, respectively. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:3707 / 3722
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-period Enviro-Economic Optimization of Municipal Solid Waste to Electricity
    Desti Octavianthy
    Ahmad Syauqi
    Nadhilah Reyseliani
    Widodo Wahyu Purwanto
    [J]. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2022, 13 : 3707 - 3722
  • [2] Enviro-economic optimization for the design of municipal solid waste management strategies
    Channarong Puchongkawarin
    [J]. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2024, 44 (3) : 674 - 694
  • [3] Multi-period design and optimization of classified municipal solid waste supply chain integrating seasonal fluctuations in waste generation
    Xie, Chaoliang
    Deng, Xuemei
    Zhang, Jingyu
    Wang, Yuqi
    Zheng, Lan
    Ding, Xin
    Li, Xiaowei
    Wu, Le
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 93
  • [4] Multi-period Planning of Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Case Study in Qingdao
    Zhao, Shifen
    Ren, Tiantian
    Ma, Lei
    Li, Zhiwei
    [J]. PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 7 (1-2) : 107 - 126
  • [5] Multi-period Planning of Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Case Study in Qingdao
    Shifen Zhao
    Tiantian Ren
    Lei Ma
    Zhiwei Li
    [J]. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2023, 7 : 107 - 126
  • [6] Multi-period sustainable and integrated recycling network for municipal solid waste - A case study in Tehran
    Harijani, Ali Mirdar
    Mansour, Saeed
    Karimi, Behrooz
    Lee, Chi-Guhn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 151 : 96 - 108
  • [7] Pyrolytic urban mining of waste printed circuit boards: an enviro-economic analysis
    Biswajit Debnath
    Soumitra Pati
    Shubha Kayal
    Sudipta De
    Ranjana Chowdhury
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (30) : 42931 - 42947
  • [8] C3MR LNG PROCESS OPTIMIZATION: AN ENVIRO-ECONOMIC STUDY
    Furda, P.
    Variny, M.
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, : 50 - 55
  • [9] Multi-Period Economic Dispatch Considering Combined Carbon and Electricity Networks
    Ding, Tao
    Yang, Qingrun
    Wang, Min
    Wu, Zhongyu
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 46 (10) : 1171 - 1182
  • [10] An Enviro-Economic Comparison of Two Different CO2 Avoidance Processes for NGCC-Derived Electricity
    Lambert, Tristan
    Hoadley, Andrew
    Hooper, Barry
    [J]. PRES15: PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2015, 45 : 289 - 294